About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (November 14, 2017)

handle is hein.crs/govceyy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





FF.     '                   riE SE-'.r  h ,q. i


                                                                                      Updated November 14, 2017

Key Issues in Tax Reform: The Mortgage Interest Deduction


Tax reform proposals are generally structured around
lowering tax rates while broadening the taxable base. The
base-broadening component of tax reform could be most
directly accomplished by eliminating special provisions in
the tax code known as tax expenditures. One of the largest
tax expenditures is the mortgage interest deduction (MID).
On the one hand, modifying or eliminating the mortgage
interest deduction could raise significant revenue. On the
other hand, any change could affect individual homeowners
and the overall economy.

ark' Sunmr of C''~            a
Currently, a homeowner may deduct the interest paid on a
mortgage that finances a primary or secondary residence as
long as the homeowner itemizes their tax deductions. The
amount of interest that may be deducted is limited to the
interest incurred on the first $1 million of combined
mortgage debt and the first $100,000 of home equity debt
($1.1 million total). If a taxpayer has a mortgage exceeding
$1 million, they may still claim the deduction, but they
must allocate their interest payments appropriately to
ensure that only the interest associated with $1 million of
debt is deducted.

Although many contend that the purpose of the mortgage
interest deduction is to promote homeownership, this was
not the deduction's original purpose. When laying the
framework for the modern federal income tax code in 1913,
Congress recognized the importance of allowing for the
deduction of expenses incurred in the generation of income,
which is consistent with traditional economic theories of
income taxation. As a result, all interest payments were
made deductible with no distinction made for business,
personal, living, or family expenses. It is likely that no
distinction was made because most interest payments were
business related at the time and, compared to today,
households generally had little debt on which interest
payments were required credit cards had not yet come
into existence and the mortgage finance industry was in its
infancy. Among those who did hold a mortgage, the
majority were farmers.

For more than 70 years there was no limit on the amount of
home mortgage interest that could be deducted. The Tax
Reform Act of 1986 (TRA86; P.L. 99-514) eventually
restricted the amount of mortgage interest that could be
deducted and limited the number of homes for which the
deduction could be claimed to two. Mortgage interest
deductibility was limited to the purchase price of the home,
plus any improvements, and on debt secured by the home
but used for qualified medical and educational expenses.
Subsequently, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1987 (P.L. 100-203) made a number of additional changes
that resulted in the basic deduction limits that exist today.


Based on 2014 IRS data (the most recent year available),
44% of all homeowners claimed the mortgage interest
deduction. Among the 56% of homeowners who did not
take advantage of the deduction, 36% had no mortgage, and
hence no interest to deduct. The remaining 20% of non-
claimants had mortgages, but likely either (1) were toward
the end of their mortgage payments so that the deduction
was not worth much, (2) lived in a state with low state and
local taxes and thus claimed the standard deduction, or (3)
lived in a low-cost area and therefore had a relatively small
mortgage. In 2014, the deduction was claimed on about
22% of all federal income tax returns and 74% of itemized
returns.

'Propo\3w  '. R,-b n t3h M0)
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1), introduced on
November 2, 2017, proposes reducing the maximum
mortgage amount eligible for the deduction from $1 million
to $500,000 for new mortgages. The bill would also
eliminate the deduction for interest paid on mortgages on
second homes and home equity loans. The Senate Finance
Chairman's mark of H.R. 1 proposes only eliminating the
deduction for interest on home equity loans.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), in its December
8, 2016, Options for Reducing the Deficit report, presented
the option of converting the mortgage interest deduction to
a 15% nonrefundable tax credit and limiting the eligible
mortgage amount to $500,000. The ability to deduct interest
associated with second homes or home equity debt would
be eliminated. The conversion would take place gradually
over six years.

The Unified Framework for Fixing Our Broken Tax Code,
issued by the Office of the Speaker on September 27, 2017,
states that it would retain the mortgage interest deduction.
The House Republican Conference's A Better Way tax
reform blueprint plan calls for the Committee on Ways and
Means to evaluate potential options to increase the
deduction's effectiveness and efficiency. Regardless of the
committee's findings, the plan states that the deduction will
not be altered for those who continue to itemize, even if the
homeowner refinances. The tax reform blueprint does not
suggest options for altering the deduction.

Former House Ways and Means Committee Chairman
Dave Camp's Tax Reform Act of 2014 (H.R. 1) proposed
preserving the deduction but reducing the eligible mortgage
amount to $500,000 over a four-year period. To lessen the
impact on the housing market, the new limitations would
only apply to new mortgage debt. Furthermore, the proposal
included a grandfather provision for refinanced debt if the
original mortgage debt was incurred prior to the mortgage
limits being reduced.


         p\w -- , gn'a', goo
mppm qq\
a             , q
'S             I
11LULANUALiN,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most