About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Hillel R. Smith, UPDATE: The End of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program: Some Immediate Takeaways 1 (2018)

handle is hein.crs/crsmthmbdpv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 








   Congressional                                                     _______
SResearch Service

               Infortmng the leg~isative debate siice 1914




 UPDATE: The End of the Deferred Action for

 Childhood Arrivals Program: Some Immediate

 Takeaways



 Hillel R. Smith
 Legislative Attorney

 January 16, 2018
 UPDATE: On January 9, 2018, following publication of this Sidebar, the U.S. District Court for the
 Northern District of California, in considering a lawsuit challenging the planned rescission of the
 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program as unconstitutional and a violation of agency
 rulemaking procedures, issued a nationwide preliminary injunction limiting the DACA phase-out to
 aliens who have not yet enrolled in DACA. For a more detailed discussion of the district court's decision
 and its potential impact, see CRS Legal Sidebar LSB]0057, District Court Enjoins DACA Phase-Out:
 Explanation and Takeaways.

 The original post from September 8, 2017, is below.

 On September 5, 2017, the Trump Administration announced that the Deferred Action for Childhood
 Arrivals (DACA) program would be phased out over a six-month period. Established in 2012 under the
 Obama Administration, DACA permits qualifying unlawfully present aliens who came to the United
 States as children to obtain a form of relief known as deferred action and, typically, work authorization
 for a renewable two-year period. While DACA provides for the deferral of any immigration enforcement
 action (e.g., removal) against a relief recipient, it does not confer any legal immigration status upon relief
 recipients.
 In 2015, a group of states and government officials obtained a preliminary injunction preventing
 implementation of a 2014 expansion of DACA and a related Deferred Action for Parents of Americans
 and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) initiative. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth
 Circuit affirmed the injunction and an equally divided Supreme Court upheld this decision without

                                                             Congressional Research Service
                                                                                   7-5700
 CRS Legal Sidebar                                                           www.crs.gov
                                                                                LSB10052
 Prepared for Members and


Committees of Congress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most