About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 (December 18, 2017)

handle is hein.crs/crsmthmbdpq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 









   SCongressional                                                         ______
          a    Research Service

               informing the leg Isative debate since 1914





The Application of the One Central Reason

Standard in Asylum and Withholding of

Removal Cases



Hillel R. Smith
Legislative Attorney


December 18, 2017

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), a non-U.S. national (alien) who fears persecution in
his native country may be eligible for asylum or withholding of removal, two forms of relief from
removal that potentially allow the alien to remain in the United States. Both applications require evidence
linking the feared persecution to a statutorily protected ground. The asylum statute expressly requires the
applicant to show that a protected ground is one central reason for the persecution (for applications filed
after May 1, 2005). But the INA is silent as to whether this standard extends to withholding of removal.
Nevertheless, most courts have-either expressly or by implication-extended the one central reason
standard to withholding claims. In Barajas-Romero v. Lynch, however, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit held that Congress did not intend for the one central reason standard to apply to
withholding of removal, creating a split among federal circuit courts regarding the extent and application
of that standard.
As a matter of practice, an alien who fears persecution if removed to a particular country typically applies
for both asylum and withholding of removal (as well as a separate form of protection under the United
Nations Convention Against Torture). However, the eligibility requirements for asylum and withholding
of removal, and the benefits that each form of relief confers, are different. In general, there is a lower
threshold necessary to prove asylum eligibility than withholding of removal. In addition, asylum
recipients have a more permanent legal foothold in the country-including the ability to adjust to lawful
permanent resident status after one year-than aliens granted withholding of removal, who may not adjust
their status, and who may still be removed to a third country. And although certain aliens are statutorily
barred from asylum and withholding of removal (e.g., certain criminal aliens, aliens who engaged in
persecution), a broader category of these restrictions apply to asylum than withholding of removal.

                                                               Congressional Research Service
                                                                                      7-5700
                                                                                www.crs.gov
                                                                                    LSB10046

CRS Legal Sidebar
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Conaress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most