About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 (November 27, 2017)

handle is hein.crs/crsmthmbdgd0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 









   Congressional                                                    _______
           ~Research Service
   Informing the Iegislative debate since 1914





The Federal Government's Plenary

Immigration Power Collides with the

Constitutional Right to an Abortion (Part I)



Hillel R. Smith
Legislative Attorney

Jon 0. Shimabukuro
Legislative Attorney

November 27, 2017
This Sidebar is the first in a two-part series discussing Garza v. Hargan, a decision by the US. Court of
Appeals for the D. C. Circuit involving a detained unaccompanied alien minor and the right to terminate a
pregnancy. The second Sidebar is available here.
In Garza v. Hargan, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (D.C. Circuit), sitting en banc, upheld
a federal district court's order requiring the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to allow a
detained 17-year-old unaccompanied alien minor to have an abortion. The alien minor (Jane Doe), who
had been apprehended by immigration authorities when attempting to enter the United States, sued the
federal government on the grounds that HHS's decision to deny her access to an abortion while she
remained in agency custody interfered with her right to terminate her pregnancy. Jane Doe obtained an
abortion following the D.C. Circuit's en banc decision. The Garza decision, however, may have broader
implications for other aliens in U.S. custody.
The court's decision to afford Jane Doe access to an abortion turned upon the application of the Supreme
Court's longstanding precedent that a woman has a constitutional due process right to terminate her
pregnancy. Nevertheless, the D.C. Circuit's decision raises renewed questions over the extent to which the
government may impose abortion restrictions, particularly in light of HHS's current policy to deny a
detained unaccompanied alien minor access to the procedure in the United States until she secures a
sponsor. In addition, the court's decision arguably leaves unresolved a threshold question - does an alien

                                                            Congressional Research Service
                                                                                  7-5700
                                                                            www.crs.gov
                                                                               LSB10032

CRS Legal Sidebar
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Conaress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most