About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

[1] (March 13, 2015)

handle is hein.crs/crsmthmaojp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

CRS Insights

  U.S.-EU Cooperation on Ukraine and  Russia
  Kristin Archick, Specialist in European Affairs (karchick crs.locaov, 7-2668)
  Derek E. Mix, Analyst in European Affairs (dmixgcrs.Iocgov, 7-9116)
    S       2015  (IN10129)

  Background

  The United States and the 28-member  European  Union (EU) have pursued similar policies in response
  to the conflict in Ukraine. (For background, see CRS Report RL33460, Ukraine: Current I   S.
  Plicy.) Both have provided financial aid to bolster Ukraine's political transition and economy,
  condemned   Russia's annexation of Crimea, and called for Russia to end its support of separatists in
  eastern Ukraine. They have also urged the full implementation of the September 2014 and February
  2015 ceasefire agreements.

  Following the annexation of Crimea in March 2014, the EU and the United States adopted a series of
  visa bans and asset freezes on several dozen Russian and Ukrainian individuals and entities. Despite
  the subsequent conflict in eastern Ukraine, however, many European officials were wary initially of
  imposing stronger sanctions that they feared might isolate and provoke Russia and jeopardize trade
  and investment relations; some EU countries highly dependent on Russian oil and gas supplies also
  worried about endangering energy  sector ties. US. officials insisted publicly that they would prefer to
  escalate sanctions on Russia in cooperation with the EU, but many, including some Members of
  Congrss,  were frustrated with the reluctance of certain EU countries to agree to tougher sanctions. In
  the absence of parallel EU action, President Obama announced U.S. sanctions on select Russian
  financial, energy, and defense companies on July 16, 2014 (see CRS Report IN 10048, S. _Sanctions
  on Russia in Resonse  to Events in Ukraine).

  Expanding  EU Sanctions

  The July 17, 2014, downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 over eastern Ukraine that killed 298
  people (mostly EU citizens) changed the political calculus in Europe. US. intelligece asserted that
  MH17  was  shot down by separatists with a missile supplied by Russia. U.S. and EU leaders alike called
  for a full investigation and reiterated that Russia must stop the flow of weapons and other assistance
  to the separatists. Continued Russian intransigence generated greater EU will to impose more stringent
  sanctions.

  On July2tE tk s           to add more individuals   and companies  to the list of those subject to EU
  travel bans and asset-freezing measures, including for the first time some of Russian President Vladimir
  Putin's inner circle. On July 29. the EU reached poitical agreement on sanctions targeting Russia's
  financial, defense, and energy sectors. Even tighter EU sanctions entered into force on September 12
  amid growing  evidence of direct Russian engagement in the fighting in eastern Ukraine.

  Experts note that the EU sectoral sanctions have been carefully crafted, both to protect specific EU
  interests and to share the economic burden throughout all 28 EU members. Together, the EU sanctions
  imposed  in July and September:

        Restrict Russia's access  to EU capital markets.  Buying or selling debt, equity, or other
        financial instruments issued by five Russian state-owned banks with a maturity of over 30 days is
        prohibited. Related services, such as brokering, are also banned, as are most loans. These same
        capital market access restrictions apply to three major Russian energy companies (including
        Rosneft) and three key defense firms. European subsidiaries of sanctioned entities are exempted.
        In general, measures targeting financial services were perhaps most controversial for the United
        Kingdom and  Cyprus, whose banks and  financial industries have attracted a considerable number
        of wealthy Russian clients over the years.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most