HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.congrecreports/crptxaajw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: AUTHENTICATEO
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION
Gp
Calendar No. 119
115TH CONGRESS REPORT
1st Session SENATE 115-92
ELKHORN RANCH AND WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST
CONVEYANCE ACT
JUNE 7, 2017.-Ordered to be printed
Ms. MURKOWSKI, from the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources, submitted the following
REPORT
[To accompany S. 286]
[Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]
The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, to which was
referred the bill (S. 286) to require a land conveyance involving the
Elkhorn Ranch and the White River National Forest in the State
of Colorado, and for other purposes, having considered the same,
reports favorably thereon without amendment and recommends
that the bill do pass.
PURPOSE
The purpose of S. 286 is to require a land conveyance by the Sec-
retary of Agriculture involving the Elkhorn Ranch and the White
River National Forest in the State of Colorado.
BACKGROUND AND NEED
Beginning in 1908, three families homesteaded near present-day
Rifle, Colorado, and for decades legally owned portions of the 148
acres identified in this bill. Shortly before the acreage was origi-
nally patented into private ownership, the General Land Office
placed the homesteads in Section 18 with east-west fence lines,
which conform to the present-day fence lines. In 1949, a new gov-
ernment survey was completed for the area that placed the bound-
ary line at an angle rather than on a true east-west line. This re-
survey led to the inclusion of 148 acres in the White River National
Forest rather than in private ownership. The landowners were
never contacted concerning the resurvey and were unaware that
69-010](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.congrecreports/crptxaajw0001&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)