About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Memorandum: Estimate of S. 543, the Mental Health Equitable Treatment Act [i] (July 2002)

handle is hein.congrec/cbo9245 and id is 1 raw text is: MEMORANDUM

To:   Interested Parties
From: Jennifer Bowman, Jeanne De Sa, and Stuart Hagen
Re:   Estimate of S. 543, the Mental Health Equitable Treatment Act
Date: July 12, 2002
This memorandum clarifies three points regarding CBO's estimate of the effect on
premiums for group health insurance of the mental health parity provisions in S. 543,
the Mental Health Equitable Treatment Act. The first discusses the range of potential
effects of S. 543 on premiums for group health plans. The second deals with the
increase in mental health expenses that would occur if the bill were to become law.
The third discusses the effect of S. 543 on federal spending for Medicaid and the
State Children's Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP), which our previous estimate
did not include.
Range of Potential Effects. CBO's estimate that S. 543 would increase premiums
for group health plans by 0.9 percent is a weighted average of the effects across both
affected and unaffected plans. Because the bill would exempt firms with 50 or fewer
employees (about 30 percent of private sector employees) from the federal
requirements, because a number of states already have laws with similar
requirements, and because some firms do not offer mental health benefits, a number
of firms would face little or no additional costs from complying with the proposed
federal law. On the other hand, many firms that currently use benefit design
elements that would be prohibited under the bill, such as having different day or visit
limits, deductibles, coinsurance, or copayments for mental health benefits than they
have for medical and surgical benefits, would experience increases in premium costs
higher than 0.9 percent.
Increase in Mental Health Expenses. We estimate that, under S. 543, affected plans
would experience an increase of between 30 and 70 percent in their mental health
costs.
Effect on Medicaid and S-CHIP. CBO's estimate of S. 543 (prepared in August
2001) did not include an effect on federal spending for Medicaid and S-CHIP. We
estimate that the bill, if enacted in 2001, would have increased federal spending for
Medicaid and S-CHIP by about $30 million in 2002, and about $600 million over the
2002-2011 period.
Questions regarding this memorandum can be directed to Jennifer Bowman and
Stuart Hagen at 226-2666 (for private sector effects) or to Jeanne De Sa at 226-9010
(for Medicaid and S-CHIP effects).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most