About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Letter to the Honorable Richard H. Baker 1 (July 2001)

handle is hein.congrec/cbo9063 and id is 1 raw text is: CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE                                                Dan L. Crippen
U.S. CONGRESS                                                              Director
WASHINGTON, DC 20515
July 11, 2001
Honorable Richard H. Baker
Chairman
Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance
and Government Sponsored Enterprises
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Mr. Chairman:
I appreciate the opportunity to respond to the criticism leveled at our report
on GSEs. As I stated in a recent letter to Franklin Raines, while there are legitimate
points of contention, I believe that the CBO report provides a credible and unbiased
answer to the questions that you posed, and that much of the criticism is misleading.
In general, there can be little dispute that the relationship with the federal
government enjoyed by the GSEs is valuable. This notion that because there are no
direct federal expenditures and therefore there can be no subsidy is simply incorrect.
The federal government engages in all sorts of programs and arrangements that
subsidize favored activities without any direct expenditures.  If the federal
imprimatur were not valuable, why all the effort to maintain it?
It is widely recognized that one of the biggest risks to the GSEs' ongoing
operations is political risk-the threat that the government might change the nature
of the relationship. Indeed, whenever such a risk surfaces, the GSEs' stocks decline
and the interest they must pay increases. Clearly, the market perceives a value to the
status quo. Therefore, the question is the value, the worth, of the implied federal
guarantees.
Despite the fact the GSEs claim our analytical framework is fundamentally
flawed it is only the GSEs and their paid consultants who make that assertion.
This methodology has been widely reviewed in and out of government, including by
participants in the market, which the GSEs claim CBO does not understand. It is
only by comparing their financial activities with institutions and mortgages that do
not enjoy their special status that we can begin to discern what it means to be a
housing GSE.

1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most