About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

S. 2508, Youth Sports Concussion Act 1 (May 31, 2016)

handle is hein.congrec/cbo2959 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                  CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE
                             COST ESTIMATE

                                                                      May 31, 2016


                                     S. 2508
                         Youth  Sports  Concussion Act

As ordered reported by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
                                 on April 27, 2016


Under current law, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has the authority to issue rules
regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices affecting commerce. S. 2508 would prohibit
importers and sellers of athletic items or equipment from making deceptive claims about
the safety benefits of an item. The bill would direct the FTC to write regulations to carry
out and enforce this prohibition and would grant states the ability to bring civil actions
against entities that violate the requirements of the bill.

On the basis of information from the FTC, CBO estimates that any increased costs to
implement  S. 2508 (which would be subject to appropriation) would not be significant
because the agency is already taking action to enforce such a prohibition under its existing
general authorities. Enacting S. 2508 would not affect direct spending or revenues;
therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures do not apply.

CBO  estimates that enacting S. 2508 would not increase net direct spending or on-budget
deficits in any of the four consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2027.

S. 2508 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the
Unfunded  Mandates Reform  Act (UMRA).  The bill would grant state attorneys general the
ability to bring civil actions on behalf of the residents of a state in cases where there is
reason to believe that an entity has violated the requirements of the bill. In such cases, the
attorney general would have to notify the FTC of such suit and, with some exceptions,
include a copy of the complaint before initiating the civil action. Consumer protection
officers in states could initiate similar actions. Because such suits would be initiated by
state attorneys general and other state officials under the new provisions included in the
bill, the requirements for notifying and filing with the FTC would not be intergovernmental
mandates as defined in UMRA.  States would take such actions at their own volition.

The CBO   staff contact for this estimate is Stephen Rabent (for federal costs) and Leo Lex
(for state impacts). The estimate was approved by H. Samuel Papenfuss, Deputy Assistant
Director for Budget Analysis.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most