About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

H.R. 212, Drinking Water Protection Act [1] (February 18, 2015)

handle is hein.congrec/cbo2072 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                  CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

0                             COST ESTIMATE
                                                                February 18, 2015


                                   H.R. 212
                       Drinking Water Protection Act

        As ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce
                               on February 12, 2015


H.R. 212 would require the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), not later than 90
days after enactment, to develop a strategic plan for assessing and managing risks
associated with algal toxins in drinking water. (Algal toxins form in waters with certain
conditions such as high levels of nitrogen and phosphorous.) The plan would include steps
EPA would take in performing various activities including evaluating risks to human
health, identifying factors that make toxins become harmful, and recommending feasible
treatment options for mitigating any adverse health effects. EPA also would be required, as
appropriate, to update and submit the strategic plan to the Congress. Finally, the bill would
require the Government Accountability Office to inventory and report to the Congress on
the amount of federal spending that occurred between 2010 and 2014 related to addressing
the health concerns stemming from algal toxins.

CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 212 would cost less than $500,000 annually over
the next two years, assuming the availability of appropriated funds. That funding would
provide for additional personnel and related administrative expenses to meet the bill's
requirements. To the extent EPA would update the strategic plan in future years, additional
funding would be required; however, CBO estimates costs would not exceed $500,000
annually.

Enacting the bill would not affect direct spending and revenues; therefore, pay-as-you-go
procedures do not apply.

H.R. 212 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and would impose no costs on state, local, or tribal
governments.

The CBO staff contact for this estimate is Susanne S. Mehlman. The estimate was
approved by Theresa Gullo, Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most