About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 George E. Worthingon, Standards for a Socialized Court for Dealing with Sex Delinquents 335 (1924)

handle is hein.congcourts/ials0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                  Reprinted from the
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL HYGIENE, Vol. X, No. 6, June, 1924 t
                    Copyright, 1924
      The American Social Hygiene Association, Inc.
           370 Seventh Ave., New York, N. Y.
                Publication No. 461


STANDARDS FOR A SOCIALIZED COURT FOR DEAL-
              ING   WITH SEX DELINQUENTS *
                     GEORGE E. WORTHINGTON
  Acting Director, Department of Legal Measures, American Social Hygiene
                               Association
                                  AND
                            RUTH   TOPPING
                Field Secretary, Bureau of Social Hygiene

   I. THE  COURT
        A.  Court  Having Jurisdiction.
           Either   a  specially  designated branch of a central-
           ized   court,  such  as  a  municipal   court,  or  a  court
           specially   created  to  handle   sex  delinquents. Laws
           re  disposition  of  defendants   and  jurisdiction   should
           be  adequate.
        B. Nature of Proceeding.
            A  summary quasi-criminal action without a jury if
            possible.   General   public  should   be  excluded.

  * The Bureau of Social Hygiene and the American Social Hygiene Association
have co6perated in a study of specialized courts dealing with sex delinquents in
four cities: Chicago, Philadelphia, Boston, and New York. The result of these
studies and a comparison of the findings appeared in the JoURNAL or SocIAL
HYGIENE.  It remains to synthesize what has been determined upon as the best
practice, taking one feature from one court and another from another, and
presenting them in a unified form.
  Comparatively few cities in the United States have separate courts for this
special type of offense. In smaller cities it is impracticable to maintain such
independent courts. It may be of value, however, to cities which are contem-
plating such an undertaking, to have presented to them in concrete form the
results of our studies. This the above paper strives to do.
  Before publication it. was submitted to specialists, including social workers,
health officers, probation officers, and judges. In some instances their criticisms
and suggestions have modified the view originally presented. Special acknowledg-
ment  for valuable criticisms are due to Chief Magistrate William McAdoo,
Magistrate Jean  Norris, Miss Alice Smith, Mr. Frederick H. Whitin, Miss
Henrietta Additon, Mr. John Weston, Mr.  Charles Chute, Dr. Win. F. Snow,
Dr. Katherine Bement Davis.

  f The American Social Hygiene Association presents the articles printed in the
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL HYGIENE on the authority of their writers. It does not necessarily
endorse or assume responsibility for opinions expressed or statements made.
                                   335

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most