HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.congcourts/fjctm0001 and id is 1 raw text is:
Commentary: Appellate Court Cases
Taglieri v. Monasky, No. 16-4128, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 29178 (6th Cir. Oct.
17, 2018)
Habitual Residence I Infants
Other Sixth Circuit Cases
Moreno v. Zank, This case addressed what standard should be
895 F.3d 917 (6th Cir. 2018) used to determine the habitual residence of an in-
fant who has lived in only one location prior to the
Ahmed v. Ahmed, its wrongful removal. Father petitioned for return
867 F.3d 682 (6th Cir. 2017) of his six-week-old child to Italy, where child was
Pliego v. Hayes, born and had lived exclusively before mother
843 F.3d 226 (6th Cir. 2016) wrongfully removed the child to the United States.
Jenkins v. Jenkins, Facts
569 F.3d 549 (6th Cir. 2009)
Simcox v. Simcox, In 2011, father, an Italian citizen studying at the
511 F.3d 594 (6th Cir. 2007) University of Illinois, met and married mother, also
a student at that university. In 2013, the couple
Robert v. Tesson, decided to move to Italy for their careers. Father
507 F.3d 981 (6th Cir. 2007) was licensed to practice medicine in Italy, and
Taveras v. Taveraz, mother received two fellowships for further study
477 F.3d 767 (6th Cir. 2007) in Italy. Father moved to Italy first, in February
2013; mother later followed. Before her move,
March v. Levine, mother sent an email to father indicating that she
249 F.3d 462 (6th Cir. 2001) did not believe [the fact that we are moving to
Sinclair v. Sinclair, Milan or Rome] means we are done with the US
121 F.3d 709 (6th Cir. 1997) [for good].
Friedrich v. Friedrich (Friedrich R Mother became pregnant in May 2014. Father be-
came sexually and physically abusive. The parties'
In re Prevot, relationship deteriorated, and they discussed di-
59 F.3d 556i(6th Cir. 1995) vorce. Mother applied for U.S. jobs but also made
Splans to have the child in Italy. After one of
98Frdc 139 F ih idrch 3) mother's pregnancy check-ups in mid-February,
she began having contractions. Father remained
at the parties' apartment while she took a taxi to
the hospital. Their versions of why father did not immediately join mother conflicted. Fa-
ther arrived at the hospital later for the birth. The child was delivered by emergency cae-
sarean section. After the birth, father returned to the parties' apartment, and mother went
to a residence in Basiglio, a suburb of Milan. The parties briefly reconciled but separated
shortly thereafter due to arguments and father's alleged threats of physical harm to
mother.
On April 15, 2015, mother left for the United States with the parties' six-week-old child.
Various factors influenced mother's eventual move back to the United States-her
Commentary- Taglieri v. Monasky
Page 1](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.congcourts/fjctm0001&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)