About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Commentary: District Court Cases, Jacquety v. Baptista, 2020 WL 5946562 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2020) 1 (2020)

handle is hein.congcourts/fjcdccj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





Commentary: District Court Cases


Jacquety   v. Baptista, 2020 WL  5946562   (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2020)


     Other District Court Cases  Jurisdiction I Standing I Redressability

  Leon v. Ruiz,               A father filed a   petition for return of his child against
  No. MO:19-CV-00293-RCG, 2020 U.S. both the child's mother and her romantic partner,
  Dist. LEXIS 43758 (W.D. Tex. Mar. 13,  alleging that her partner assisted with the abduc-
  2020)                             tion. The partner moved for summary judgment on
                                    the grounds that he was not related to child and
  Pope v. Lunday,
  No. CIV-1 9-01122-PRW, 2019 WL    had no custody or control over the child, and ac-
  711615 (W.D. Okla. Dec. 23, 2019) cordingly could not respond to or comply with an
                                    order that the child be returned. The district court
  Cunningham v. Cunningham,    denied summary judgment, holding that he was
  237 F. Supp. 3d 1246 (M.D. Fla. 2017)  properly joined as a respondent.

  Marquez v. Castillo,
  72 F. Supp. 3d 1280 (M.D. Fla. 2014)  Holdings

                                    The International Child Abductions Remedies Act
(ICARA) does not require a respondent to be related to or have legal authority over a child.
A person who assists in the abduction of a child by planning or supporting the abduction,
or who assists in concealing the child, is properly named as a respondent. Such persons
are also potentially liable for reimbursement of the petitioner's fees and costs.

Facts

A father petitioned for the return of his child to Casablanca, Morocco, after the mother
allegedly feigned taking the child to Switzerland for a family visit, but ultimately arranged
for herself and the child to travel to New York. In addition to naming the mother in his
petition for return, the father also named her friend Wadghiri, claiming that the two were
romantically involved and that Wadghiri had planned the mother's removal of the child.
The father alleged that Wadghiri had helped the mother draft a letter to send to the father
which made  what he claimed were false allegations of abuse, had helped plan transpor-
tation for the mother and child to New York, had obtained counsel for the mother, and
had assisted with the child's abduction. After arriving in New York, the mother and child
lived with Wadghiri.

Wadghiri wrote to the court, arguing inter alia that he was improperly named in the Hague
petition because he was not a relative or custodial parent of the child and could not comply
with an order for return because he had no control or legal authority over the child. The
district court construed Wadghiri's letter as a motion for summary judgment and denied
the motion.


Commentary-Jacquety v. Baptista


Page 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most