About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Gerald A. Reynolds, et al., Letter: Commission to Eric Holder: Voter Intimidation and the New Black Panther Party 1 (2009)

handle is hein.civil/usccve0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                             UNITED  STATES                         624 Ninth Street, N.W.
                             COMMISSION   ON                        Washington, D.C. 20425
                             CIVIL RIGHTS


August  10, 2009

The Honorable  Eric Holder
Attorney General
U.S. Department  of Justice
Washington,  DC  20530

Dear Attorney  General Holder:

       Pursuant to our statutory mandate, we sent inquiries on June 16 and 22 to the Civil Rights
Division's Acting Assistant Attorney General, Loretta King, regarding the unusual dismissal of
the government's  case against most of the defendants in United States v. New Black Panther
Party for Self-Defense, Civ. No. 09-0065 SD  (D.   Pa.) (NBPP  case).' We regret that the reply
from Portia Roberson, Director of the Office of Intergovernmental and Public Liaison, is largely
non-responsive  to our questions. To the extent it is responsive, it paints the Department in a poor
light. We also reviewed  correspondence between  DOJ  and Members   of Congress  who raised
similar questions about the case. The July 13 letter from Assistant Attorney General Ronald
Weich  to House  Judiciary Committee  Ranking Member   Lamar  Smith  is also non-responsive and
includes what we  believe to be factual errors and asserts novel and questionable legal claims. As
we  explain below, the DOJ's replies thus far raise new and serious questions about its civil rights
enforcement  decisions, which we believe we are obligated to investigate.

        Moreover, news  stories3 have now raised questions about Ms. King's role in the decision
to dismiss the suit against the NBPP.4 whose members,  with military-style uniforms and
weapons,  taunted voters with racially-intimidating comments as they approached the polls.' The
news  stories also report certain steps by senior political appointees at DOJ in approving the
dismissal of most of the case and the extremely narrow injunction against the sole remaining
defendant.  That Associate Attorney General  Thomas  Perrelli, a political appointee, reportedly
approved  the dismissal of the suit against a Democratic poll worker raises several questions. In
light of these reports, it may have been a mistake to address our initial inquiry to Ms. King or

'The  decision to begin our inquiry was reached during an open meeting of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights on
June 12, 2009. Chairman Reynolds, Commissioner Gaziano, Commissioner leriot, and Commissioner Kirsanow
voted to begin the inquiry with the letter that was subsequently sent on June 16 (Commissioner Melendez abstained
from the vote). On June 22, Vice Chair Thernstrom and Commissioner Taylor, who were not present at the time the
vote was taken, sent their own letter to Ms. King joining the request for relevant information on the case. The
signatories to this letter have voted to expand the Commission's investigation as reflected herein, with
Commissioners Melendcz and Yaki abstaining.
2 Ms. Roberson did not date her letter. Commission staff stamped it as received on July 24.
  See, e.g., Jerry Seper, No. 3 at Justice OK' Panther Reversal, WASH. TIMES, July 30, 2009.
  4 The New Black Panther Party for Self Defense has been identified as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law
  Center and the Anti-Defamation League, among others. Southern Poverty Law Center, Active U.S Hate Groups in
  US. available online; Anti-Defamation League, New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense, available online;
  National Geographic Channel, Inside the New Black Panthers, available online. Nor is its influence small. The
  Anti-Defamation League claims that it has become the largest organized anti-Semitic black militant group in
  America. Anti-Defamation L_,eague, supra.
  * NBPP Case, No. 09-0065 (ID. Pa. filed Jan. 7, 2009) (Compl. ¶¶ 8-11).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most