About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Gerald A. Reynolds, et al., Letter: Commission to Loretta King: Voter Intimidation and the New Black Panther Party 1 (2009)

handle is hein.civil/usccvc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                         UNITED STATES                         624 Ninth Street, N.W.
                         COMMISSION  ON                        Washington, D.C. 20425
                         CIVIL RIGHTS




June 16, 2009

Ms. Loretta King
Acting Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Assistant Attorney General, Main
Civil Rights Division
U.S. Department  of Justice
950 Pennsylvania  Avenue, NW
Washington,  DC  20530

Dear Ms.  King:

       One  of the U.S. Commission  on Civil Rights' first official projects upon its
establishment by the Civil Rights Act of 1957-the same  act that created the Civil Rights
Division-was   to convene hearings in Alabama  to look for evidence of racial
discrimination in voting there. Witness after witness testified of efforts to interfere with
their right to vote, whether by threats, intimidation, coercion, trickery or the erection of
legal or other impediments. The data gathered by the Commission  formed  the basis for
the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which is unequivocal in its command that no person,
whether  acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or
attempt to intimidate, threaten or coerce any person fRom voting or attempting to vote or
from aiding a voter. 42 U.S.C. § 1973i (2009). Investigating such claims and bringing
them  to the attention of enforcement entities such as the Department of Justice are a part
of the Commission's  statutory mandate to this day. 42 U.S.C. § 1975a (2009).1 Our
mandate  also includes investigating and reporting to the President and Congress on how
well federal agencies are enforcing the nation's civil rights laws.

        So it is with great confusion that we2 learn of the Civil Rights Division's recent
decision to dismiss a lawsuit against defendants who were caught engaging in attempted
voter suppression the likes of which we haven't witnessed in decades. Specifically,
defendants were  caught on video blocking access to the polls, and physically threatening
and verbally harassing voters during the November 4, 2008 general election. They wore
uniforms  bearing the insignia of the New Black Panther Party, described by the Division
as a black-supremacist organization, and one of them actually brandished a nightstick
in plain view of voters and poll observers. Complaint ¶¶ 9, 13. Furthermore, the
Division's own  complaint alleges that defendants made statements containing racial

1 In 2006, for example, the Commission called upon then-Attorney General Gonzalez to fully and
vigorously investigate reports that Spanish-surnamed individuals in Orange County received
correspondence seeking to intimidate them from voting in the mid-term elections that year.
2 The decision to send this letter was arrived at in an opening meeting of the United States Commission on
Civil Rights on June 12, 2009 by majority vote of the Commissioners present. The vote was 4 to 0 with
one member abstaining. The signatories to this letter all voted in favor of the motion.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most