About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

1 Need for Improved Transparency on "Geofence" and "Keyword Warrants" [i] (December 8, 2020)

handle is hein.brennan/bcjggle0001 and id is 1 raw text is: December 8, 2020 Sundar Pichai Chief Executive Officer Google, LLC 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 sndar(a goolecorm Via U.S.P.S & Email Re: Need for Improved Transparency on Geofence and Keyword Warrants. Dear Mr. Pichai, We, the undersigned civil rights, labor, and civil society organizations, call on Google to aid us in opposing the alarming growth in law enforcement searches of Google user data. While law enforcement agencies have sought Google account data for years, we write in response to the increasing reports of novel warrants and other court orders that demand far more data than in the past. This includes the use of so-called geofence warrants, which compel disclosure of all devices in a geofenced area, and so-called keyword warrants, which identify every user who searched for a specific keyword, phrase, or address. These blanket warrants circumvent constitutional checks on police surveillance, creating a virtual dragnet of our religious practices, political affiliations, sexual orientation, and more. Reports indicate that Google has complied with an increasing number of these non-traditional warrants in recent years.' For example, according to Google's submission in United States v. Chatrie, you received a 75-fold increase in geofence warrant requests from 2017 to 2019.2 This limited reporting has been indispensable in building public awareness about this unconstitutional surveillance tactic. While we are grateful that Google made the limited disclosures that it did in United States v. Chatrie, we urge you to do more. As a leading recipient of geofence and keyword warrants, Google is uniquely situated to provide public oversight of these abusive practices. We ask you to do just that by expanding your industry- leading transparency report to provide monthly data on the number of non-traditional court orders received, including granular information on geofence warrants, keyword warrants, and any analogous requests. By providing this semiannual breakdown of requests, tracking the growth of these abusive tactics over time, you'll provide us and other civil society organizations vital ammunition in the fight for privacy. 1 Eg., Alfred Ng, Google Is Giving Data to Police Based on Search Keywords, Court Docs Show, CNET (Oct. 8, 2020, 1:21 PM), httpi/_vwwcnet.cognews l-ivin-data-to- pliccased-on-search-k_ is-court-does-show. 2 Brief of Amicus Curiae Google LLC in Support of Neither Party Concerning Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence from a Geofence General Warrant at 3, United States v. Chatie, No. 3:19-cr-00130 (E.D. Va. Dec. 23, 2019), ECF No. 73 (reporting a 15-fold increase in geofence warrants from 2017 to 2018 and a further 5-fold increase in 2019).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most