About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Why the Episcopal Church Does Not Identify Herself Openly with Prohibition 1915

handle is hein.beal/whyeich0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Why the Episcopal Church Does Not Identify
Herself Openly With Prohibition.
Bishop Boyd Vincent of Southern Ohio Tells Why the Episcopal Clergy Are
Justi ied In Not Introducing the Subject Into Their Pulpits.
So Far Pro bition Has Become a Political Issue, Our Church's Attitude on
This is-nly a Part of Her General Attitude of Keeping Politics Out
of the Pulpit, Says the Bishop in the Church Messenger.

The

C.urch

VOL. XXXVII.

Messenger

CINCINNATI, DECEMBER, 1915.
Ye shall be witnesses unto Me. -Acts 1:8.

The MESSENGER has asked me to
state the attitude of our Church on this
problem; why she does not identify her-
self openly, as some other churches do,
with Prohibition; and how our clergy
are justified, if they are, in not introduc-
ing the subject into the pulpit.
Well, to start with, let us carefully
distinguish between the attitude of the
Church, as such, and the rights and
duties of her individual members and
ministers, as such. The Church, as a
whole, may seem to have an attitude in
this matter, but she has no declared
policy on it in particular; and therefore
neither I nor any one else can speak
authoritatively for her as a whole. All
iat I can do is to offer some probable
xplanations of her attitude.  If this
ttitude seems to some to be one of
- moral cowardice, perhaps on a larger
-('iew of the whole subject it may look
different.  Of the rights and duties of
her members and ministers as individ-
nals, I shall speak later on.
Church Not in Politics.
1. In the first place, then, so far as
Prohibition has become a political issue,
our Church's attitude on this is only a
part of her general attitude of keeping
politics out of the pulpit.
When Jesus said, Render to Caesar
the things that are Caesar's, and to God
the things that are God's, he declared
that politics and religion are entirely
distinct spheres of duty. When he re-
fused to act as a judge in a dispute over
a will, he left to the civil authority what
properly belonged to it and confined his
own duty. and that of his followers. to
teaching righteousness in all things
One of the charges which Bob Ingersoll,
the infidel, brought against Christianity
that it had never denounced slavery as a
moral wrong and crime. That is true.
Neither our Lord nor His apostles con-
demned slavery as a matter of morals,
but they evidently felt sure that any in-
justice in it as a social institution would.
like any other such injustice, and with-
out direct attack, be eventually remedied
by the Gospel spirit. This has been the
case. In this spirit both England and
Russia  abolished  slavery.  So  when
slavery was made a moral issue in our
own country, the South clearly had the
words of the Bible and of the American
Constitution on its side; but the Gospel
spirit finally triumphed over the letter of
both. But when, during tie Civil War
slavery was also made a political issue
and the Methodist and Presbyterian
Churches took it up, as politics, into their
pulpits, this was the result:-that both
these Churches were split in two, and
have remained divided. North and South,
ever since, Episcopalians, as individuals
and on both sides, were just as positive
and aggressive in their views on slavery
and just as active in fighting for them;
but the Episcopal Church, as a Church,
kept the issue, as politics, out of her
pulpits, with this result:-that after the
war her Southern members and ministers
stepped right back into their old places,
and the Episcopal Church, was and is
still as entirely one as before the war.
Prohibition a Political Issue.
So in the matter of Prohibition. Now
that the issue has come to be a political
one, the Episcopal Church, as such, has
not opposed it, but, on the same general

principle, has simply not taken it up
into her pulpit as widely as some other
churches have done. But her people, as
individual citizens, are just as free as
any body else to work and vote for Pro-
hibition; and her individual ministers
are just as free as others to take it into
their  pulpits  or express  themselves
publicly in any other way about it, if
they want to. And they actually do it.
For instance, at our 'recent Provincial
Synod in Chicago, representing our
Church in five States, the following action
was taken:
The Bishop of Chicago presented the
following resolutions:
The Synod of the Province of the
Mid-West, assembled in the Cathedral
of SS. Peter and Paul, Chicago, rep-
resenting twelve dioceses of the Episco-
pal Church, desires to put on record its
deep gratitude that, in accordance with
the laws of the State of Illinois, the
saloons of the City of Chicago have been
closed on Sunday.
We congratulate the people of Chi-
cago on this forward step. We hope
that it may be one in a series of for-
ward steps towards the higher welfare
of the community. We believe that this
progressive movement in the direction
of temperance and law observance will
have a far-reaching effect for good
throughout the entire Middle West and
throughout the land.
Against Intemperance and Lawlessness.
We take this opportunity /of exhort-
in7 thc clergy and laity of that part of
the Church which we represent to take
on frest COUTre and fresh vigor in the
warfare against intemperance and law-
lessness and their allied evils; and, To
this end, that they give increased co-
operation to those movements which are
clearly making for temperance, law-
abidingness, the abolition of the saloon,
the consequent diminution of crime and
poverty, and for the moral and social
betterment of the community. Carried.
By all means, then, every Episcopal
minister who believes that Prohibition is
a moral issue ought to speak and work
for it with all his might, both in the
pulpit and out of it. But the connection
of the pulpit with the subject, as politics,
is not a question of right and duty, but
simply one of Christian expediency,
where the issue, as politics, may divide
and destroy a whole congregation or a
whole Church.
Many Conscientiously Differ.
2. But there is also another view of
the matter.
Prohibition, especially as politics, is
by no means a simple issue. There are
many questions connected with it about
which men may fairly and conscientious-
ly differ. For example: Nation-wide
or State-wide prohibition, or more
restricted  local  option-the  moral
right or wrong in itself of the manufact-
tire and sale of liquor-whether the
saloon is altogether an unmitigated evil,
etc. Some men may stand for personal
rights and racial customs, and the
rights of a large minority as against a
bare majority, and may even differ about
the practical possibility  of enforcing
prohibition and the moral effect of
failure to do so.
Again, no question but a community
has a right to protect itself by legisla-

tion against any general menace to its
peace and prosperity, and this as against
any mere personal rights and interests in
the case. But there may be a fair ques-
tion as to the best public policy in such a
case-viz., Whether repression or regula-
tion. All of us would like to see the
social evil stamped out completely and
forever, if it could be done. But police
authorities differ decidedly, even while
recognizing the, evil to the full, as to
wether segregation and strictly regulated
toleration is not really greater social
security than attempted dissipation Oto
points where the evil would still go on
secretly and without any control. So,
in this matter before us, there may be
a question, even between good men, as
to whether Prohibition or High License
in the safer or more jict socia policy.
Are the Churches Working at the Right
End of This Matter?
And then still another fundamental
question-of moral reform   as against
any form of legal repression.  Here is
the vast evil of personal intemperance,
the sin of drunkenness, as old as the
world. Here is the whole business of
making and selling liquor, which, when
you have said your best for it, certainly
carries with it such an endless train
of evils, personal, domestic, social and
political. But is Prohibition the only
effective and really permanent remedy
for all these evils? Are the Churches.
as a matter of moral and religious duty,
workiing today at the right end of the
matter? Isn't the Church's first Gospel
duty to deal with and save the drunkard
himseii Who that is tifty years old
does not remember the wonderful good
done by Father Matthew in preaching
temperance, rescuing and reforming
drunkards and working an almost na-
tion-wide moral reformation by his great
temperance revival; or the same real
and noble kind of work done later by
John B. Gough and Francis Murphy?
Who does not know the steady, success-
ful work being done all the time by the
Roman Church in her Total Abstinence
Societies? And may it not be that if
all the time and strength now given to
Prohibition were spent in temperance
revivals, in reaching and reforming in-
dividual drunkards, and in creating a
public opinion resolutely opposed to
drink-would not such a movement car-
ry everybody with it, and might it not
be that by such means far the larger
part of the liquor trade would eventually
be put out of business?
Two Sides to Question.
At any rate, here are all these ques-
tions about which even Christian men
may conscientiously differ and vote ac-
cordingly as citizens. Must a clergyman,
then, however he regards and deals with
Prohibition as a question of morals, be
rated'as less than a Christian if he de-
clines to commit either himself or his
congregation to either side of the ques-
tion, as one of politics?
Let every man be fully persuaded in
his own mind. . . . But why dost thou
judge thy brother? Or why dost thou
set at naught thy brother?    For we
shall all stand before the judgment seat
of God. . . . So then every one of us
shall give an account of himself to God.
-(Rom. 14.)          BOYD VINCENT.

Reproduction by Permission of Buffalo & Erie County Public Library Buffalo, NY

No. 11

C' 4P (14=4 aub OP Iliquar Problem

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most