About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

15 Endangered Species Tech. Bull. 1 (1990)

handle is hein.animal/endanspb0015 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Vol.   XV   No. 1


Technical Bulletin


Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Washington, D.C. 20204


Austin Regional Habitat Conservation Plan


            David A. Tilton'
                 and
         Joseph  E. Johnston2

  Austin, Texas, and its environs contain
one of the largest known concentrations
of Endangered and other vulnerable spe-
cies in a major metropolitan area. Be-
cause of concerns for these animals and
plants, and for the effects that their pro-
tection could have on development in the
Austin area, a committee of developers
and conservationists has been formed to
prepare an Austin Regional Habitat Con-
servation Plan (Regional Plan).
  The  committee's objective is to identify
and  carry out measures,  such as  the
establishment of a habitat preserve, that
would  ensure  the survival of Austin's
endangered  wildlife while accommodating
orderly economic development. Interest in
these issues is running high. In 1988, an
environmental organization, Texas Earth
First!, gave notice of intent to sue several
developers and government agencies for
alleged violations of the Endangered
Species Act. Although no suit has been
filed, the organization's notice helped to
bring the divergence between advocates
for Austin's endangered wildlife and many
development  interests into focus. Both
sides  now  appear to have  a greater
appreciation for the benefits of a conser-
vation partnership.
  The six listed species in the Austin area
covered by the Regional Plan are a song-
bird, the  black-capped  vireo  (Vireo
atricapillus), and five cave-dwelling inver-
tebrates: the Tooth Cave spider (Lep-
toneta myopica), Tooth  Cave  pseudo-
scorpion (Microcreagris texana), Tooth
Cave   ground  beetle  (Rhadine  per-
sephone), Bee  Creek Cave  harvestman
(Texella reddelli), and Kretschmarr Cave
mold beetle (Texamaurops reddelli). The
Regional  Plan  also addresses  three
Category  2 listing candidates: another
songbird, the golden-cheecked warbler
(Dendroica chrysoparia), and two plants,
the bracted twistflower (Streptanthus
bracteatus)  and the  Texas  amorpha
(Amorpha  roemeriana).
  The status of the black-capped vireo is
of particular concern. Biologists with the
Service's Fort Worth, Texas, Field Office


black-capped vireo


report a continuing decline in the species'
nesting population within Travis County
(which includes Austin). In 1987, there
were indications of 81 nesting pairs in the
area. By 1988, however, the number had
dropped  to 40, and in 1989 only about
27 nesting pairs remained.

Take   and   Incidental   Take
  Under  certain circumstances,  con-
struction activity within the habitat of a
listed species can constitute take, a vio-
lation of the Endangered Species Act and
its implementing  regulations. Take is
defined in the Act as harass, harm, pur-
sue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, cap-
ture, or collect, or attempt to engage in
any  such conduct.  Fish and Wildlife
Service regulations define harass and
harm as follows:
  harass-an  intentional or negligent act
or omission that creates the likelihood of
injury to wildlife by annoying it to such an
extent as to significantly disrupt normal
behavioral patterns, which include, but


are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering.
  harm-an act   which  actually kills or
injures wildlife. Such an act may include
significant habitat modification or degra-
dation where  it actually kills or injures
wildlife by significantly impairing essential
behavioral patterns, including breeding,
feeding, or sheltering.
  Section 10(a) of the Act authorizes the
Service to grant permits to non-Federal
entities for the incidental take of listed
species under certain circumstances. The
Service defines this term as takings that
result from, but are not the purpose of,
carrying out an otherwise lawful activity.
To obtain an incidental take permit, the
applicant must submit a Habitat Conser-
vation Plan to the Service outlining the
likely impacts on listed species from the
taking, procedures for minimizing and mit-
igating the impacts, and funding sources
for implementing these procedures. (See
50 CFR  17.22.) At a minimum, the Habitat
Conservation Plan must ensure that any
                 (continued on page 6)


ENDANGERED SPECIES TECHNICAL BULLETIN Vol. XV No. (1990)


January 1990


foam

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most