About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

15 Info. Rep.: Animal Welfare Inst. 1 (1966)

handle is hein.animal/awiqu0015 and id is 1 raw text is: 











January - February - March, 1966


     ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE
       -      B

P.O0. Box 3492, Grand Central Station, New York, N. Y. 10017


  POAGE BILL REPORTED FAVORABLY
               BY SUBCOMMITTEE
    Congressman W. R. Poage, Vice Chairman of the
 House Committee on Agriculture and Chairman of its
 Livestock and Feed Grains Subcommittee introduced
 H. R. 12488 authorizing the Secretary of Agriculture to
 regulate the transportation, sale, and handling of dogs,
 cats and other animals for purposes of research or ex-
 perimentation. The bill has just been reported favorably by
 the Subcommittee. A release from Congressman Poage's of-
 fice states: Although the bill includes all vertebrates
 which are used for research or experimentation, the im-
 pact of this legislation will deal mainly with dogs and cats.
   The Democrat from Texas, author of the Humane
 Slaughter Act of 1958, pointed out that research facilities
 and laboratories last year used well over two million dogs
 and cats for which they spent almost $50 million.
   This great scientific demand for dogs and cats has
 given rise to a vast network of dealers (especially in the
 Northeast - but all across the nation), some of whom ob-
 tain these animals in any manner they can, Mr. Poage said,
 Often they, or their employees, comb the streets, pick-
 ing up strays and family pets. These animals are then
 stripped of any identification and removed from the area
 (generally across state lines) as soon as possible to pre-
 vent owners reclaiming their stolen pets and to get beyond
 the reach of state laws. It is not rare for these unfortunate
 animals to change hands several times before reaching
 the research institution. Large public auctions are held
 where other dealers buy the animals and take them on
 to the laboratory. Many of these dealers make huge pro-
 fits in this business.
   I want to emphasize that my bill in no way regulates
 or restricts the research facility's handling of these ani-
 mals during actual research or experimentation. The pur-
 pose of this legsilation is not to interfere with scientific
 research but to stop the indescribably terrible conditions
 under which these unfortunate creatures are transported
 and handled before and after the experimentation. There
 are several other bills pending on this general subject. I
 hope this bill contains the best features of each.
   The bill would require dealers and research facilities to
keep records of sale, purchase, and identification, which
would always be open to inspection.
   The Secretary of Agriculture would be authorized to
promulgate standards to govern the handling and trans-
portation of dogs, cats, and other animals by both dealers
                   (Cont. on page 4)
         LIFE PHOTOGRAPHS DOGS
      FOR SALE TO LABORATORIES
   LIFE Magazine published, on February 4th, an article
entitled  Concentration Camps for Dogs, which brought
home in unmistakably clear terms the ghastly suffering
that animals for sale to laboratories are needlessly under-
going.
   The photography of an emaciated English Pointer, pur-
chased by the Laboratory Animal Consultant of the Animal
Welfare Institute from a dog dealer at an Oklahoma dog
auction, covered the first two.pages, and the raid of .a
Maryland dog dealer by the Humane Society of the United
States followed. On the last pages were Three that made
it back to their owners, an English Setter, an Irish Setter,
and a crossbred hound who had daily conducted a family
of seven children to school, and was picked up on one
of his return- trips by the dog warden and sold to Harvard
Medical School.
  A   limited number of reprints are available from  the
Animal Welfare Institute, for those who may have missed
the article.


Vol. 15, No. 1


   While bitter arguments over proper housing of lab-
 oratory animals have continued over a period of years
 (humanitarians contending that all species should be
 provided with a comfortable resting place away from
 metal mesh, and laboratory directors often contending that
 it didn't matter), a careful study on the most commonly
 used laboratory species was done by a veterinary student
 at Michigan State University. Miss Helene Artsay's paper
 has been published in M. S. U. VETERINARIAN, Vol.
 26, No. 1, and, with the kind permission of author and
 editor, is reprinted below.

     A Preliminary Study of the Habitat
         Preferences of White Mice in a
              Laboratory Environment
                   Helene Artsay *
                   INTRODUCTION
   Many types of medical research require strict control of
 external factors which might influence the physiology of
 the experimental animals.' It is essential for the inves-
 tigator to have a thorough knowledge of the animals' pre-
 ferred living conditions in order to eliminate the possibility
 of variables due to environmental stress. Moreover, such
 information helps a conscientious researcher provide the
 highest quality of care and treatment for his experimental
 subjects.
   Inasmuch as white mice are very commonly used as
 research animals, and there is some controversy as to the
 best methods of housing them, Z 3, 4 a study of the habitat
 preferences of these animals might be valuable.
         MATERIALS AND METHODS
   In this study, six week old male white mice were given
two cages, each containing a different housing arrange-
ment, and permitted to choose the cage most to their lik-
ing. Four experimental units, one mouse per unit, were
used in each experiment. Some experiments were repeated
for a total of eight mice tested per choice situation.
   The experimental unit was adapted from one first dev-
eloped and described by Dr. Lee R. Dice.5 The unit con.
sisted of two clear plastic cages of the lid-top type, joined
by a plastic passageway containing a see-saw treadle to
which was attached a mercury switch (see Figure 1). The
switch was connected to an electrical timer arranged to
make a continuous record in ink on a moving kymograph.
As the mouse crossed from one cage to the other, the
treadle and mercury switch tipped from one direction to
the other. In one direction the switch was disconnected,
bypassing the timer, and the pen recorded a straight line
on the paper. In the other direction the switch was con-
nected and the timer caused the pen to record an inter-
rupted line.
   Inasmuch as the kymograph paper moved at a constant
speed it was possible, by measuring the lengths of the
ink lines, to determine: a. in which cage the mouse was
at any particular time in a twenty-four hour period, b. how
much time he spent in each cage, and c. how many times
he changed from one cage to the other.
  The experiments were conducted in a small quiet isolat-
ed room, where temperature did not vary more than four
degrees in a twenty-four hour period. As further protec-
tion against disturbance, the units were placed in a wood-
en cabinet curtained with organdy on one side to allow
ample air circulation and light. Both cages in a unit were

*The author is a senior student in the College of Ve.
terinary Medicine, Michigan State University

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most