About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1979 AEI Economist 1 (1979)

handle is hein.amenin/aeieco1979 and id is 1 raw text is: 






    the w# economist

    American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research ,                        April 1979
    IN




           Two Views of the Budget-Balancing Amendment


        The idea that the Federal budget should be balanced has been standard A merican doctrine for
        a long time (except, probably, among economists since about 1930). But the budget has in fact
        been balanced in only nine of the past fifty years and in only one of the past twenty. In the
        past fifty years there have been $626 billion of deficits and $34 billion of surpluses. About
        $247 billion of those deficits, or 40 percent of them, came in the five fiscal years 1975-1979.
          These large deficits of recent years occurred at a time when the inflation rate was
       exceptionally high and the growth of productivity exceptionally low. They also came at a time
       when  the belief was growing that government expenditures were too high and were not
       yielding benefits equivalent to their costs. In the minds of many people, persistent and
       growing budget deficits have been a major cause of these ills. Despairing of correcting the
       situation by more conventional means, they seek to eliminate deficits, or at least drastically
       limit them, by a constitutional amendment requiring the Federal government to balance its
       budget save in exceptional circumstances.
         Others see the facts quite differently. They would point out that the recent deficits occurred
       in a five-year period when the average unemployment rate was much higher than in any
       preceding five-year period back to the 1930s, and probably higher than in any other five-year
       period of this century except for the 1930s. And while the recent deficits have been large by
       historical standards, so has almost everything else about the American economy. They would
       deny that deficits have been a significant cause of recent economic difficulties and fear that
       commitment  to budget-balancing would dangerously limnit the ability of national policy to
       respond to the needs of an uncertain world.
          This issue of the AEI Economist presents the views of two outstanding economists on the
       desirability of a constitutional amendment to require a balanced budget. Their statements,
       which were presented as testimony before the Subcommittee on Monopolies and Commercial
       Law  of the Committee on the Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives, deal with many
       of the leading arguments in the current debate.
         Dr. Arthur F. Burns is Distinguished Scholar in Residence of the American Enterprise
       Institute and former Chairman of the Board of ?overnors of the Federal Reserve System.
         Dr. Paul A. Samuelson is Institute Professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and
       Nobel Laureate in Economics. His statement begins on page 4.

                                                                            HERBERT  STEIN

                                      By  Arthur  F. Burns
I appreciate the opportunity to participate in the proposal for a  constitutional requirement of a
deliberations of this distinguished Committee on   balanced budget.
the wisdom of a constitutional amendment requir-  Let me state  at the outset that I favor the principle
ing a balanced Federal budget.                     of such a constitutional requirement, but that I am
  In your recent address at the National Governors also mindful of the practical difficulties that attach
Conference, Mr. Chairman, you spoke with moving    to this proposal. I therefore welcome your counsel
eloquence of the need for calm and  rational ex-   of care, reason, and caution.
amination of the facts and issues surrounding the    I have  watched with great concern the  rapid


The AEt Economist / April 1979 / I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most