About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (1997)

handle is hein.amenin/aeiaapg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 













                                           This volume  examines  the effect
                                           of rate regulation in cable televi-
                                           sion and focuses on the impact of
                                           price controls on consumer  wel-
                                           fare. Thomas W. Hazlett  and
                                           Matthew   L. Spitzer find that rate
                                           regulation in cable television has
                                           affected consumers  in a number
                                           of significant ways, though not
                                           always in accord with common
                                           expectations or popular conclu-
                                           sions. Deregulation following the
Cable  Act of 1984 led not to a fly-up in rates but to price increases driven
by-and   commensurate with-quality upgrades in the cable television pack-
age. Reregulation  following the Cable Television Consumer  Protection and
Competition   Act of 1992, after a false start in 1993, did effectively constrain
cable rates by about 8 to 10 percent in 1994. The reregulation of cable, how-
ever, was accompanied   by a dramatic drop in viewer ratings for basic cable
program   services, which suggests a loss of quality in the eyes of consumers.
         The most  dramatic evidence of the failure of rate regulation to lower
rates is found in data that indicate that subscribership was neither restricted
by  cable deregulation nor expanded  by reregulation. The strong support
given to regulation by competitors to cable, including broadcasters and local
telephone  companies,  and the vocal opposition to rate regulation expressed
by  programming   interests further buttress the hypothesis that rate regulation
has  not lowered quality-adjusted cable rates. That failure of regulation is all
the more  striking in light of the overwhelming evidence that cable operators
enjoy  considerable amounts  of market power, price substantially above aver-
age  cost, and realize excess returns.

Thomas   W. Hazlett is professor of agricultural and resource economics at the
         University of California, Davis.
 Matthew  L. Spitzer is the William T. Dalessi Professor of Law at the
         University of Southern California.



The  MIT  Press
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
HAZPH
0-262-08253-5
The  AEI  Press
Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute
1150 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most