About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Case Citations [1] (July 2017 through August 2018)

handle is hein.ali/seccontract0186 and id is 1 raw text is: CONTRACTS 2D Generally C.A.8, 2018. Cit. generally in sup. In determining that an employer could not change the terms of its unilateral offer to pay a bonus to its employees who remained in their positions for five years after those employees accepted the offer by commencing performance, this court held, among other things, that the Supreme Court of Missouri would likely conclude, consistent with Restatement Second of Contracts § 45, that the beginning of performance rendered the offer of a unilateral contract binding so that the offeror could no longer revise its terms. In making its decision, the court noted that the Supreme Court of Missouri routinely found the Restatement Second of Contracts persuasive. Boswell v. Panera Bread Company, 879 F.3d 296, 303. D.D.C.2017. Cit. generally in sup. In an action against the federal government and others by former federal prisoner who was mistakenly held in custody for three days after the date that he should have been released, this court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff s claim for breach of contract, holding that plaintiff did not, by applying for and being accepted into an early-release program, enter into a binding contract with defendant that required it to ensure that he was released on a specified day. The court relied on principles of the federal common law of contracts, many of which were reflected in the Restatement Second of Contracts, in concluding that defendant did not manifest the requisite intent to enter into a legally binding obligation. Gibson v. District of Columbia, 270 F.Supp.3d 241, 246. D.P.R.2016. Cit. generally in case cit. in sup. In an action by arrestee who was shot by federal agents during the execution of a search warrant, this court denied the government's motion for summary judgment, holding that a question of fact remained as to whether the agents reasonably believed that they needed to shoot arrestee in self-defense under Restatement Second of Torts § 65. In making its decision, the court noted that, in cases where Puerto Rico law had not diverged from common-law principles, it considered the Restatement Second of Torts and Restatement Second of Contracts in the absence of controlling Puerto Rico law. Escalera-Salgado v. United States, 261 F.Supp.3d 163, 168. CHAPTER 1. MEANING OF TERMS § 1. Contract Defined Ark.App.2017. Com. (c) cit. in diss. op. Following the discovery that their home had settling and other problems, homebuyers filed a breach-of-contract claim against former real-estate agent that had failed to provide them with sellers' disclosure and had advised them against getting a home inspection. The trial court entered summary judgment for defendant. This court affirmed, holding, inter alia, that defendant was not a party to the offer-and-acceptance real-estate contract between sellers and plaintiffs. The dissent cited Restatement Second of Contracts § 1, Comment c, in explaining that a contract could be a set of promises and that there could be multiple promisors and multiple promisees in one contract, and For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most