About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Case Citations [1] (July 2018 through August 2019)

handle is hein.ali/rethtort9912 and id is 1 raw text is: TORTS 3D: INTENTIONAL TORTS TO PERSONS (DRAFTS) CHAPTER 1. DEFINITIONS OF INTENTIONAL TORTS TO PERSONS; TRANSFERRED INTENT § 2. Battery: Required Intent N.D.I11.2018. Com. (a) cit. in sup. (citing § 101, com. (e), of D.D. 2014). Airline employees brought a class-action lawsuit against airline and uniform manufacturer, alleging that their new uniforms contained harmful chemicals causing various health issues, and that airline knew about those adverse health effects. This court granted defendants' motion to dismiss without prejudice, holding, inter alia, that plaintiffs' intentional-tort claims against airline were precluded because the claims failed to allege a sufficient level of intent borne by airline to bring their claims out of their states' workers' compensation statutes. The court relied on Restatement Third of Torts: Intentional Torts to Persons § 101 (D.D. 2014) in explaining that plaintiffs failed to allege that airline knew with certainty that the uniforms would harm a particular victim or someone in a small class of potential victims. Zurbriggen v. Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc., 338 F.Supp.3d 875, 888. § 7. False Imprisonment: General Definition D.Mass.2018. Rptrs' Note to com. (a) cit. in ftn. (citing Rptrs' Note to com. (a) to § 7 of T.D. No. 3, 2018). After airline employees accused passenger of having stolen a bag, detained passenger, and forced passenger to walk off the plane and several hundred yards through a British airport, passenger brought a false-imprisonment claim against airline. This court granted defendant's motion to dismiss, holding that a two-year statute of limitations under the Montreal Convention barred plaintiff's claims. The court cited Restatement Third of Torts: Intentional Torts to Persons §§ 7 and 9 in observing that the nomenclature of false imprisonment could create confusion, such as by misleadingly suggesting that the tortfeasor had to assert a falsehood to commit false imprisonment. Dagi v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 352 F.Supp.3d 116, 117. § 9. False Imprisonment: Confinement by Assertion of Legal Authority D.Mass.2018. Com. (c) cit. in ftn. (citing § 9, com. (c), of T.D. No. 3, 2018). After airline employees accused passenger of having stolen a bag, detained passenger, and forced passenger to walk off the plane and several hundred yards through a British airport, passenger brought a false-imprisonment claim against airline. This court granted defendant's motion to dismiss, holding that a two-year statute of limitations under the Montreal Convention barred plaintiff's claims. The court cited Restatement Third of Torts: Intentional Torts to Persons §§ 7 and 9 in observing that the nomenclature of false imprisonment could create confusion, such as by misleadingly suggesting that the tortfeasor had to assert a falsehood to commit false imprisonment. Dagi v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 352 F.Supp.3d 116, 117. COPYRIGHT 02019 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most