About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Case Citations [1] (July 2019 - April 2020)

handle is hein.ali/rethrida0133 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                                     AGENCY 3D




                          CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTORY MATTERS

                        TOPIC   1. DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY

§ 1.01 Agency  Defined

C.A.4, 2019. Quot. in sup. Consumer, who was on a Do-Not-Call registry, brought a class action against
satellite-television company, alleging that defendant violated federal telemarketing statutes by
employing  a sales representative to telephone plaintiff. The district court entered judgment on a jury
verdict for plaintiff. This court affirmed, holding, inter alia, that, based on its agency relationship with
sales representative, defendant was liable for sales representative's violations of federal law. The court
explained that, under the list of factors set forth in Restatement Third of Agency § 1.01, defendant had
an agency relationship with the sales representative, because defendant had broad authority over the
sales representative's business, the sales representative was authorized to use defendant's name and logo
during its operations, and defendant knew about sales representative's illegal actions and took no action
to ensure compliance with federal law. Krakauer v. Dish Network, L.L.C., 925 F.3d 643, 659-660.

C.A.6, 2019. Rptr's Note (c) cit. in conc. op. Employee sued employer, seeking damages for injuries he
allegedly sustained at work. The district court dismissed employee's complaint as a sanction for his and
his attorney's conduct in refusing to answer questions at a court-ordered independent medical
examination. Affirming, this court held that the record supported a finding that employee and his
attorney both acted in bad faith and willfully violated the court's discovery order. The concurring
opinion stressed that misconduct by a party was not a precondition to dismissing a case as a sanction for
misconduct by the party's lawyer, because parties became bound by the actions of lawyers taken on their
behalf with actual or apparent authority under the Restatement Third of Agency and the Restatement
Third of the Law Governing Lawyers.  Mager v. Wisconsin Central Ltd., 924 F.3d 831, 841.

C.A.8, 2019. Cit. in sup. and in ftn. Recipients of telemarketing calls brought a class action against,
among  others, owner of investor company, alleging, inter alia, that defendant was directly liable for
violations of federal telemarketing regulations, because his company hired a telemarketing contractor to
call plaintiffs as part of a marketing scheme. The district court entered judgment on a jury verdict for
plaintiffs. This court affirmed, holding that the district court did not err in rejecting plaintiffs' jury
instructions regarding defendant's direct liability, because plaintiffs incorrectly stated the law to allow
the jury to find defendant directly liable even though he did not initiate the calls. The court explained
that defendant was vicariously liable under Restatement Third of Agency § 1.01, because he hired the
telemarketing contractor that violated federal regulations, and his company could be vicariously liable
because he entered into the contract with the telemarketing contractor while acting in his capacity as an
officer of the company. Golan v. FreeEats.com, Inc., 930 F.3d 950, 961.

C.A.9, 2019. Com.  (c) cit. in diss. op. Former employee sued former employer, alleging, among other
things, wrongful and discriminatory failure-to-promote. The district court granted employer's motion in

                             COPYRIGHT 02020 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
                                            All rights reserved
                                     Printed in the United States of America
          For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most