About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Case Citations [1] (July 2020 - August 2021)

handle is hein.ali/rethdfr0045 and id is 1 raw text is: THE FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE UNITED STATES 3D PART IV. JURISDICTION AND JUDGMENTS Introductory Note C.A.10, 2020. Intro. Note quot. in sup. Environmental groups challenged a determination by the National Park Service that a federal wildlife regulation, which prohibited hunting in national parks, did not apply to state- or privately-owned lands known as inholdings that were located within the exterior boundaries of Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming. The district court affirmed the National Park Service's action. This court affirmed in part, holding that the National Park Service's determination that the regulation did not apply to the park's private inholdings was not contrary to law or arbitrary and capricious. The court cited the definition of legislative jurisdiction or jurisdiction to prescribe set forth in the Restatement Third of Foreign Relations Law in reasoning, in part, that Wyoming did not cede to the National Park Service its legislative jurisdiction over private inholdings in the park. Defenders of Wildlife v. Everson, 984 F.3d 918, 924. CHAPTER 5. IMMUNITY OF STATES FROM JURISDICTION SUBCHAPTER A. IMMUNITY OF FOREIGN STATES FROM JURISDICTION TO ADJUDICATE § 454. Claims in Tort C.A.9, 2020. Com. (a) cit. in sup. Investment firm and its principal sued Qatar and others, alleging that Qatari agents hacked into plaintiffs' computer servers, stole their confidential information, and leaked it to the media in retaliation for plaintiffs' criticism of the Qatari regime and its support of terrorism. The district court granted defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Affirming on different grounds, this court held that the Act barred plaintiffs' claims against Qatar. The court cited Restatement Third of Foreign Relations Law § 454 in explaining that the tortious-activity exception to foreign sovereign immunity was inapplicable as a matter of law, because plaintiffs failed to advance a claim that was facially outside the discretionary- function exclusion. Broidy Capital Management, LLC v. State of Qatar, 982 F.3d 582, 589. CHAPTER 8. FOREIGN JUDGMENTS AND AWARDS SUBCHAPTER A. FOREIGN JUDGMENTS: LAW OF THE UNITED STATES § 481. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments COPYRIGHT ©2021 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most