About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Case Citations [1] (July 2021 - April 2022)

handle is hein.ali/resttpl4308 and id is 1 raw text is: 





               TORTS 3D: PRODUCTS LIABILITY



  Generally

  D.Mass.2020.  Cit. generally in case quot. in sup. Patient who was surgically implanted with a
  polytetrafluoroethylene mesh patch to treat an inguinal hernia sued manufacturer of the patch, after the
  patch caused an abscess and had to be removed. This court denied in part manufacturer's motion to
  dismiss, holding that patient's claim for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability based on a
  design defect was not absolutely barred by Restatement Second of Torts § 402A, Comment k. The court
  noted that, in determining whether a product's design was unreasonably dangerous, Massachusetts
  courts applied a risk-utility balancing standard similar to the one articulated in the Restatement Third of
  Torts: Products Liability, where consumer expectations were a factor, but not necessarily a
  determinative factor. Taupier v. Davol, Inc., 490 F.Supp.3d 430, 444.

  E.D.N.Y.2021.  Cit. generally in ftn., cit. generally in case cit. in ftn. Ferry passenger sued ferry operator,
  alleging, inter alia, that defendant defectively manufactured and designed the stairwell of its stairway
  used for disembarking passengers, because its irregular shape caused plaintiff to slip and fall. This court
  granted in part defendant's motion for summary judgment, holding that plaintiff could not prevail on his
  claim for defective manufacturing and design, because defendant did not design or manufacture the
  ferry. The court noted that federal caselaw disagreed as to whether the Restatement Third of Torts:
  Products Liability applied to this instant case; to the extent it did, the court observed that plaintiff's
  claim failed because he set forth no evidence that defendant was engaged in the business of selling or
  distributing ferry boats. Nasser v. Port Imperial Ferry Corp., 524 F.Supp.3d 68, 75.

  E.D.Wis.2021.  Cit. generally in ftn. Former residents of homes that used lead-based paint brought,
  among  other things, a strict-products-liability claim against manufacturer of lead-based paint, alleging
  that plaintiffs were injured from ingesting lead-based paint that was used in their childhood homes. This
  court denied in part defendant's motion for summary judgment, holding that there was a genuine issue
  of material fact as to the defective condition of defendant's lead-based paint and defendant's breach of
  its duty to warn. The court noted that defendant's arguments relied on the Restatement Third of Torts:
  Products Liability, which was not adopted by state legislature until after plaintiffs filed their claims.
  Allen v. American Cyanamid,  527 F.Supp.3d 982, 995.

  Introduction

  Tex.2021. Intro. quot. in sup. Mother of injured minor child brought, among other things, a strict-
  products-liability claim against operator of online retail marketplace, alleging that defendant placed a
  defective remote into the stream of commerce that plaintiff's husband purchased from defendant's
  website, resulting in child's injuries. The district court denied defendant's motion for summary
  judgment. The court of appeals certified a question to this court. This court answered, holding that
  defendant was not a seller of the remote for the purposes of state products-liability statutes, because
  the record did not indicate that defendant ever held or transferred title of ownership over the remote. The
  court observed that it was appropriate to rely on the Restatement Third of Torts: Products Liability to


                               COPYRIGHT ©2022 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
                                             All rights reserved

A  -I-I                                Printed in the United States of America
            For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most