About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Case Citations [1] (July 2018 through August 2019)

handle is hein.ali/resttpl4303 and id is 1 raw text is: 





             TORTS 3D: PRODUCTS LIABILITY



 CHAPTER 1. LIABILITY OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCT SELLERS BASED ON PRODUCT
                                 DEFECTS AT TIME OF SALE

Pa.Super.2018. Cit. in case cit. in disc. §§ 1-8, which constitutes all of Ch. 1. Firefighters filed a
products-liability action against siren manufacturer, alleging that they suffered permanent hearing loss
due to exposure to the noise of defendant's siren, which was unreasonably dangerous and defective and
negligently designed. The trial court entered summary judgment in part for defendant and dismissed all
remaining claims. This court affirmed, holding that plaintiffs' proof that their proposed alternative
design met the industry standard was not sufficient to establish a prima facie case that it was more
effective for all users. The court noted that Pennsylvania followed Restatement Second of Torts § 402A,
instead of the Restatement Third of Torts: Products Liability, regarding strict-products-liability law
governing design defects. Dunlap v. Federal Signal Corporation, 194 A.3d 1067, 1070.



         TOPIC   1. LIABILITY   RULES   APPLICABLE TO PRODUCTS GENERALLY

§ 2. Categories of Product Defect

N.D.I11.2018. Cit. in disc. (general cite); subsec. (b) cit. in disc. Airline employees brought a class-action
lawsuit against airline and uniform manufacturer, alleging, inter alia, products-liability claims arising
from allegations that plaintiffs' new uniforms contained harmful chemicals that caused various health
issues. This court denied manufacturer's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, holding that
plaintiffs alleged enough facts about the unreasonably dangerous nature of the uniforms, the dangerous
chemicals existing in the uniforms at the time the uniforms left manufacturer's control, and the
chemicals causing plaintiffs' injuries. The court noted that some states followed the requirements of
establishing a design defect found in Restatement Third of Torts: Products Liability § 2, under which a
manufacturer would be liable for unreasonable harm caused by its products if it could have adopted a
reasonable alternative design but had chosen not to, and determined that, despite the variance of state
law at issue here, plaintiffs pleaded sufficient facts to maintain a design-defect theory at this stage.
Zurbriggen v. Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc., 338 F.Supp.3d 875, 898, 899.

Ariz.2018. Cit. in disc. Patient who had an infusion pump and catheter device implanted brought, inter
alia, common-law claims of negligent failure to warn against designer and manufacturer of the pump,
alleging that defendants failed to report adverse events to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
about the device's tendency to over-infuse patients with drugs, and that he suffered permanent injury as
a result of this over-infusion. The trial court granted defendants' motion to dismiss, finding that
plaintiff's state-law claims were preempted by federal law. The court of appeals reversed in part, finding
that plaintiff's claims for negligent failure to warn were not preempted. This court vacated the ruling of
the court of appeals and affirmed the trial court's ruling, holding that the duty to warn the FDA only
arose from federal statutes, which impliedly preempted any state-law claims based on that duty. The
court observed that, under Restatement Third of Torts: Products Liability § 2, manufacturers generally

                             COPYRIGHT 02019 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
                                           All rights reserved
                                    Printed in the United States of America
          For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most