About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Case Citations [1] (July 2018 through April 2019)

handle is hein.ali/restt5027 and id is 1 raw text is: 





    TORTS 3D: APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY



                TOPIC 1. BASIC RULES OF COMPARATIVE RESPONSIBILITY

  § 5. Negligence Imputed to a Plaintiff

  Md.2018. Com. (c) quot. in sup. Car owner, who was injured as a passenger in the car while the car was
  being driving by her husband, filed a claim for negligence against driver who backed his truck into the
  car and injured her. The trial court found that the negligence of plaintiff s husband had to be imputed to
  plaintiff under the doctrine of imputed negligence, because she was the sole owner of the car at the time
  of the accident. The court of appeals affirmed. Reversing, this court declined to apply the both ways
  theory of the doctrine of imputed negligence to hold an innocent owner-passenger such as plaintiff
  contributorily negligent and defeat a claim against a negligent third party such as defendant. The court
  noted that Restatement Second of Torts § 485 and Restatement Third of Torts: Liability for Physical and
  Emotional Harm § 5 rejected the both ways theory and did not apply the doctrine of imputed
  negligence to establish a defense of contributory negligence in an automobile tort case. Seaborne-
  Worsley v. Mintiens, 183 A.3d 141, 152.

  § 7. Effect of Plaintiff's Negligence When Plaintiff Suffers an Indivisible Injury

  Md.Spec.App.2018. Cit. in sup., cit. in case cit. in ftn.; com. (m) quot. in sup., cit. in case cit. in ftn.
  Patient and his wife brought a claim for medical malpractice against physician, alleging that physician
  negligently cut patient's bile duct in the course of surgically removing patient's inflamed gallbladder;
  physician asserted as a defense that patient was contributorily negligent in failing to timely seek
  treatment for his severe abdominal pain. The trial court entered judgment on a jury verdict for physician.
  Reversing and remanding for further proceedings, this court held that the trial court erred in permitting
  physician to pursue a defense of contributory negligence based solely on patient's pre-treatment
  conduct. The court explained that, under Restatement Third of Torts: Apportionment of Liability § 7, the
  purported negligence of a patient that preceded any medical treatment could not be raised as a defense of
  contributory negligence by a physician who subsequently treated the patient. Barbosa v. Osbourne, 183
  A.3d 785, 793.

  Utah, 2017. Com. (j) quot. in sup. and cit. in ftn. Consumer whose foot was crushed by a reclining chair
  that had a foot-massage attachment, and consumer's wife, who bought the chair for him as a gift,
  brought claims sounding in strict liability, breach of warranty, and rescission against retailer and
  manufacturer of the chair. The trial court granted retailer's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' tort and
  warranty claims under the passive-retailer doctrine. Reversing in part and remanding, this court held that
  the passive-retailer doctrine incorporated considerations of culpability into a strict-liability doctrine in a
  manner that was incompatible with Utah's Liability Reform Act. The court explained that, under
  Restatement Third of Torts: Apportionment of Liability § 7, a retailer that was found strictly liable for
  selling a defective product had a right to assert an indemnification claim against a manufacturer or other
  entity responsible for the defect in the product. Bylsma v. R.C. Willey, 416 P.3d 595, 621.



                               COPYRIGHT 02019 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
                                             All rights reserved

ALI                                   Printed in the United States of America
            For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most