About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Case Citations [1] (July 2019 - August 2020)

handle is hein.ali/restfrus4204 and id is 1 raw text is: THE FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE UNITED STATES 4TH: SELECTED TOPICS IN TREATIES, JURISDICTION, AND SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY PART IV. JURISDICTION, STATE IMMUNITY, AND JUDGMENTS CHAPTER 1. PRESCRIPTION SUBCHAPTER B. CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW GOVERNING JURISDICTION TO PRESCRIBE § 412. Jurisdiction Based on the Protective Principle C.A.D.C.2020. Cit. in sup. Criminal defendants who attacked two American law-enforcement officers in Mexico, killing one and wounding the other, appealed from their convictions for killing an officer of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1114, using a firearm while committing a crime of violence in violation of § 924(c), and killing certain persons protected under international law in violation of § 1116. This court vacated defendants' convictions under § 1114 and remanded for limited re-sentencing, holding that one of the officers only qualified for protection under § 1114, which did not apply extraterritorially. The court noted, however, that both § § 924(c) and 1116 applied extraterritorially under the protective principle as set forth in Restatement Third of Foreign Relations Law § 402 and Restatement Fourth of Foreign Relations Law § 412, which allowed a state to exercise jurisdiction to protect its officials overseas. United States v. Garcia Sota, 948 F.3d 356, 362. CHAPTER 8. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES § 483. Mandatory Grounds for Nonrecognition E.D.Va.2019. Com. (b) quot. in sup. Ex-girlfriend, an Ethiopian native who became a U.S. citizen, brought a claim for breach of contract against ex-boyfriend, also an Ethiopian native who had created with plaintiff a company to form and run a school on his property in Ethiopia, alleging that after the parties entered into a contract to dissolve their company and sell the school to defendant, defendant failed to make the scheduled payments to plaintiff; defendant counterclaimed, filed suit in Ethiopia, and obtained Ethiopian judgments that the contract was a mere draft. This court entered judgment for plaintiff, holding, inter alia, that the Ethiopian judgments were not entitled to recognition. Citing Restatement Third of Foreign Relations Law § 482 and Restatement Fourth of Foreign Relations Law §§ COPYRIGHT ©2020 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most