About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Case Citations [1] (Fall 2023)

handle is hein.ali/resndjmts0047 and id is 1 raw text is: THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Fall 2023 Citations JUDGMENTS 2D Generally Cal.App.2023. Cit. generally in disc. Building owner sued roofing company, after a coating company installed on owner's building developed numerous leaks, alleging that defendant breached the express warranty in the parties' contract. The trial court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment. This court affirmed, holding that the doctrine of claim preclusion barred plaintiff's claims, because plaintiff had previously brought an unsuccessful action against defendant arising from other leaks purportedly caused by defendant's roof-coating work. The court observed that plaintiff would not prevail under the Restatement Second of Judgments, because plaintiff did not allege that the leaks at issue in this action were caused by a different instance of roof-coating application than in the preceding action, and the primary right under which plaintiff brought this action was the same as in the preceding action. 5th & LA v. Western Waterproofing Co., Inc., 303 Cal.Rptr.3d 855, 861. CHAPTER 2. VALIDITY OF JUDGMENTS TOPIC 2. TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION § 8. Attachment Jurisdiction D.C.App.2022. Com. (d) quot. in sup. Creditor sued buyer of a condominium located in the District of Columbia, seeking to judicially foreclose on the condominium to satisfy a 2001 California judgment that creditor obtained against a debtor who formerly owned the condominium and registered in the District of Columbia in 2006. The trial court denied buyer's motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations and granted summary judgment for creditor, ordering the condominium to be sold and the proceeds to be applied to the judgment. Affirming, this court held, among other things, that the statute of limitations began to run on the date creditor registered the California judgment in the District of Columbia. The court cited Restatement Second of Judgments § 8 in noting that, under the common law, a separate civil action had to be filed to establish a foreign judgment, and an action based on a judgment entered in another state was considered a new and independent action. Czajka v. Holt Graphic Arts, Inc., 285 A.3d 524, 529. CHAPTER 3. FORMER ADJUDICATION: THE EFFECTS OF A JUDICIAL JUDGMENT COPYRIGHT C2023 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most