About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Case Citations [1] (April 2022 - August 2022)

handle is hein.ali/resndjmts0045 and id is 1 raw text is: THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE JUDGMENTS 2D CHAPTER 2. VALIDITY OF JUDGMENTS TOPIC 1. NOTICE § 2. Adequate Notice Tex.App.2020. Rptr's Note to com. (a) cit. in case quot. in sup. Churches sued city, seeking a declaration that city's new ordinance, which increased water rates charged to institutions like churches, was void. After city informed churches that it had previously obtained a final judgment under the Expedited Declaratory Judgment Act declaring, among other things, that the imposition of the new rates was legal and valid, the trial court granted churches' motion for a new trial in the prior action, finding that, although city had provided notice by publication as authorized under the Act, its failure to provide churches with individual notice deprived them of due process. This court affirmed on interlocutory appeal. A concurring opinion pointed out that city knew that churches were interested in litigating the validity of the new rates on constitutional grounds, and cited Restatement Second of Judgments § 2 in explaining that, when, as here, a defendant's identity was known, service by publication was generally inadequate. City of Magnolia v. Magnolia Bible Church, 629 S.W.3d 471, 476. TOPIC 3. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION § 11. Subject Matter Jurisdiction Wyo.2022. Quot. in sup. State sought forfeiture of currency that was possessed by motorist and seized pursuant to a traffic stop, alleging that motorist's interests in the currency should be terminated. The trial court denied motorist's motion to dismiss. This court affirmed, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that it had general subject-matter jurisdiction over civil forfeiture proceedings, because relevant statutes did not confer exclusive jurisdiction over such proceedings to statutory circuit courts. The court noted that determining issues of subject-matter jurisdiction was vital to the proceedings, because, under Restatement Second of Judgments § 11, judgment could be rendered against a party only if the court had authority to adjudicate the type of controversy. Matter of U.S. Currency Totaling $14,245.00, 503 P.3d 51, 54. § 12. Contesting Subject Matter Jurisdiction Ariz.App.2022. Cit. in sup., cit. in case quot. in sup., cit. in diss. op.; subsecs. (1) and (2) quot. in sup.; com. (a) quot. in diss. op.; coms. (c) and (e) cit. in diss. op. After state agency imposed civil penalties against nonprofit corporation that aired political advertisements for violating certain statutory reporting COPYRIGHT C2022 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most