About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Case Citations July 2015 through February 2016 [1] (2015-2016)

handle is hein.ali/resndjmts0032 and id is 1 raw text is: JUDGMENTS 2D Generally Md.Spec.App.2015. Cit. generally in cases cit. and quot. in ftn. In a case seeking review of an administrative decision revoking a plumber's license, this court affirmed the trial court's judgment on the basis of collateral estoppel arising from an earlier administrative ruling. In making its decision, the court observed that it gave considerable, and at times persuasive, weight to the Restatement Second of Judgments. Garrity v. Maryland State Bd. of Plumbing, 221 Md.App. 678, 687, 110 A.3d 769, 774. CHAPTER 2. VALIDITY OF JUDGMENTS TOPIC 1. NOTICE § 3. Irregularity of Notice Tex.App.2014. Quot. in case quot. in sup. Mother, a member of the Cherokee Nation, appealed the termination of her parental rights, alleging that the termination order was invalid because the trial court failed to strictly comply with the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act. Affirming, this court held, inter alia, that the notice was not inadequate. The court reasoned that there was no evidence that the trial court's failure to strictly comply with the notice requirements had a negative effect on the Cherokee Nation's interest in the matter. Quoting Restatement Second of Judgments § 3 for the proposition that, when actual notice of an action had been given, irregularity in the content of the notice or the manner in which it was given did not render the notice inadequate, the court explained that, although, here, notice was not given in the manner the statute required, the tribe had received actual notice and was involved in the proceeding. In re K.S., 448 S.W.3d 521, 530. TOPIC 2. TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION § 7. Jurisdiction Over Status Vt.2014. Com. (a) quot. in sup. Uncle, who resided in Vermont, filed a complaint for relief from abuse against nephew, who resided in New Hampshire, after an incident in New Hampshire in which nephew punched, kicked, and stepped on uncle, causing uncle to be hospitalized. The trial court granted uncle's request for a final relief-from-abuse order. Reversing, this court held that the trial court lacked the personal jurisdiction over nonresident nephew that was required to issue a final relief-from-abuse order against him. The court reasoned that a final abuse-prevention order had significant impact on a defendant's substantive rights and constituted a restraint on defendant's liberty that a court could not order without personal jurisdiction over the defendant under Restatement Second of Judgments § 7. Fox v. Fox, 106 A.3d 919, 925, 926. .m X.J2I m For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most