About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Case Citations [1] (July 2019 - August 2020)

handle is hein.ali/resndacy0134 and id is 1 raw text is: AGENCY 2D Generally D.N.J.2019. Cit. generally in sup. Customer filed a negligence claim against store, promoter of an event at the store, and disc jockey hired for the event, alleging that a large loudspeaker furnished and operated by disc jockey for the event emitted a blast of sound as he was walking by, causing him to sustain hearing loss, hyperacusis, and tinnitus. This court granted in part store's motion for summary judgment, holding that store was not liable for the actions of promoter or disc jockey under the doctrine of respondeat superior, because the evidence in the record demonstrated that neither promoter nor disc jockey was store's employee or servant under the Restatement Second of Agency. The court noted that New Jersey relied on the Restatement Second of Agency to determine whether a master-servant relationship existed, as well as whether the injury occurred within the scope of the agent's employment. Maran v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC, 417 F.Supp.3d 510, 527. W.D.Okl.2019. Cit. generally in case quot. in sup. Former employer sued, among others, three former employees, alleging that they breached their fiduciary duties to employer when they helped found a competing company during their tenure with employer. This court denied in part employees' motion to dismiss, holding that employer sufficiently alleged that employees owed it a fiduciary duty. The court noted that Oklahoma courts had repeatedly cited the Restatement Second of Agency in their analysis of agency relationships. ATS Group, LLC v. Legacy Tank and Industrial Services LLC, 407 F.Supp.3d 1186, 1193. Md.2020. Cit. generally in sup. Homeowners brought a lawsuit against homeowners' association, alleging, inter alia, that defendant violated state consumer-protection laws through the actions of law firm that it had hired to perform debt-collection services for delinquent homeowners' fees. The trial court granted defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law. The court of appeals reversed in part and remanded in part. This court affirmed, holding, among other things, that a principal-agent relationship existed between defendant and law firm. The court rejected defendant and law firm's argument relying on caselaw that their relationship was that of independent-contractor and employer, and explained that such caselaw did not depart from principles set forth in the Restatement Second of Agency, because the caselaw only discussed physical injuries. Andrews & Lawrence Professional Services, LLC v. Mills, 223 A.3d 947, 970, 972. CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTORY MATTERS TOPIC 1. DEFINITIONS § 1. Agency; Principal; Agent Idaho, 2020. Com. (e) cit. in sup. Gym client brought claims of negligence against gym trainer and gym, alleging that plaintiff's fractured hand was caused by trainer's negligence while plaintiff was using a weight machine on gym premises. The trial court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment, COPYRIGHT ©2020 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most