About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Case Citations [1] (2017)

handle is hein.ali/resndacy0128 and id is 1 raw text is: AGENCY 2D Generally C.A.11, 2017. Cit. generally in cases cit. in sup. In an action seeking unpaid rent from the government of Belize, based on a lease agreement that was entered into on behalf of defendant by a government minister, this court affirmed the district court's denial of defendant's motion to dismiss, holding that defendant was bound by a sovereign-immunity waiver contained in the agreement. The court noted that the Restatements of Agency were a useful beginning point for a discussion of general agency principles, and determined that it did not need to decide whether the minister had the authority to enter into the agreement, because defendant subsequently ratified his action. GDG Acquisitions LLC v. Government of Belize, 849 F.3d 1299, 1308. CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTORY MATTERS TOPIC 1. DEFINITIONS § 1. Agency; Principal; Agent C.A.11, 2017. Subsecs. (2) and (3) quot. in case quot. in sup. Lessor of telecommunications equipment brought an action against the government of Belize, seeking millions of dollars in unpaid rent based on the parties' lease agreement, which was entered into on behalf of defendant by a government minister. The district court granted defendant's motion to dismiss; the court of appeals vacated and remanded. On remand, the district court denied defendant's motion to dismiss. Affirming, this court held that defendant was bound by a sovereign-immunity waiver contained in the agreement. The court cited Restatement Second of Agency § 1 for a definition of an agency relationship, and determined that, here, it did not need to decide whether the minister had authority to enter into the agreement, because defendant subsequently ratified his action by making payments in accordance with the lease schedules for two concurrent five-year leases and by retaining its benefits under the agreement. GDG Acquisitions LLC v. Government of Belize, 849 F.3d 1299, 1308, 1309. § 8B. Estoppel-Change of Position N.Y.Sup.Ct.App.Div.2017. Cit. in sup. Corporation filed a fraudulent-misrepresentation claim against retail store, among others, regarding defendant's director of in-store marketing's verification of accounts receivable that were issued to defendant. The trial court granted defendant's motion to dismiss. This court affirmed, holding that plaintiff failed to state a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation based on, among other things, apparent authority. Citing Restatement Second of Agency § 8B, the court explained that plaintiff failed to allege that defendant intentionally or carelessly caused plaintiff to believe that defendant's director of in-store marketing or its divisional vice president of franchise development had the authority to verify receivables on its behalf, because plaintiff s allegations that defendant knew or For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most