About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Case Citations [i] (July 2016 through April 2017)

handle is hein.ali/resfrlus0041 and id is 1 raw text is: 





        THE FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE

                              UNITED STATES 2D





                                         INTRODUCTION

  § 4. State Defined

  C.A.2, 2016. Cit. in case cit. in sup. Victims of terrorist attacks linked to the Islamic Republic of Iran,
  against which victims held unsatisfied money judgments, asserted jurisdiction under the Foreign
  Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) in order to bring a claim to enforce these judgments against New
  York-based companies with connections to Iran. The district court entered summary judgment for
  plaintiffs. Reversing, this court held that because defendants lacked many of the attributes of statehood,
  including a defined territory and population, self-governance and foreign relations, and the capacity to
  wage war and to enter into international agreements, defendants did not qualify as a foreign state under
  the FSIA. In construing the term foreign state, the court looked to the definition of state set forth in
  Restatement Second of Foreign Relations Law § 4. Kirschenbaum v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related
  Properties, 830 F.3d 107, 124.

                                     PART   I. JURISDICTION

                             CHAPTER 2. BASES OF JURISDICTION

                    TOPIC   4. PROTECTION OF OTHER STATE INTERESTS

  § 33. Protective Principle

  C.A.11, 2016. Subsec. (1) quot. in sup. After a jury convicted criminal defendant of sex trafficking, the
  district court sentenced defendant to a term of imprisonment and ordered him to pay restitution to his
  victims; however, the district court refused to award restitution to a victim of defendant's sex trafficking
  in Australia, based on its determination that it would be unconstitutional to enforce a federal statute
  providing that federal courts had extraterritorial jurisdiction over sex trafficking by a noncitizen who
  was present in the United States. This court vacated in part and remanded with an instruction for the
  district court to increase defendant's restitution obligation, holding that Congress had the constitutional
  authority to punish sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion that occurred overseas. The court
  reasoned, in part, that the exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction over defendant was consistent with the
  protective principle of international law set forth in Restatement Second of Foreign Relations Law § 33.
  U.S. v. Baston, 818 F.3d 651, 670.









A  L I uFor earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most