About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Case Citations [1] (July 2017 through August 2018)

handle is hein.ali/resctlw0153 and id is 1 raw text is: CONFLICT OF LAWS 2D Generally D.Colo.2017. Cit. generally in ftn. After their cardholders' credit and debit information was the target of a cyberattack against restaurants headquartered in Colorado, credit unions located in various states brought a purported class action against restaurants' owner. This court granted defendant's motion to dismiss, holding that the economic-loss doctrine barred plaintiffs' claims, because the duties of care allegedly breached arose from interrelated contractual obligations between defendant and payment-card networks. The court noted that Colorado followed the Restatement Second of Conflict of Laws in applying choice-of-law rules. SELCO Community Credit Union v. Noodles & Company, 267 F.Supp.3d 1288, 1292. N.D.Miss.2017. Cit. generally in cases quot. in disc., cit. generally in ftn. In a products-liability action brought by wife of tractor driver who suffered a fatal injury in Mississippi against German manufacturer of the tractor and manufacturer's German successor corporations, this court denied summary judgment for manufacturer and granted summary judgment for successor corporations, applying German law to the issue of successor liability. The court noted that where a true conflict of law existed, Mississippi followed the Restatement Second of Conflict of Laws and that, according to the Mississippi Supreme Court, the rule of lex loci delicti had given way to the rules of the Restatement. Bouchillon v. SAME Deutz-Fahr, Group, 268 F.Supp.3d 890, 899, 902. Colo.App.2016. Cit. generally in disc. In a debt-collection action brought by assignee of Nebraska bank against Colorado resident who failed to make payments on a loan issued by bank, this court reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment for plaintiff, holding that the trial court erred in failing to apply Nebraska law, given the note's valid and effective Nebraska choice-of-law provision, and that plaintiff s claims were barred by Nebraska's five-year statute of limitations. The court relied on Restatement Second of Conflict of Laws § 187, noting that Colorado often applied the approach set forth in the Restatement for choice-of-law issues. Mountain States Adjustment v. Cooke, 412 P.3d 819, 823. CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION § 6. Choice-of-Law Principles D.Mass.2017. Cit. in sup.; subsec. (2) quot. in case quot. in sup. Scientist who resided in Massachusetts sued California website operator and operator's employees who resided in California and Canada, alleging that defendants defamed him by publishing a series of 14 articles on the website that disagreed with his claim that he was the inventor of email. While granting defendants' motions to dismiss, this court denied defendants' motion to strike pursuant to the California anti-SLAPP statute, holding that defendants failed to overcome the presumption that Massachusetts law applied under Restatement Second of Conflict of Laws § 150, as the law of the state where plaintiff was domiciled. The court For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most