About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Case Citations (March 2016 through June 2016) [i] (2016)

handle is hein.ali/resctlw0148 and id is 1 raw text is: CONFLICT OF LAWS 2D Generally D.Del.2015. Cit. in case quot. in sup. In a dispute between parties to a stock-purchase agreement, this court held, among other things, that buyer's claim for breach of contract was governed by Delaware law pursuant to the Delaware choice-of-law clause contained in the agreement, but buyer's claim for misappropriation of trade secrets was governed by New York law, because New York was where buyer was incorporated, where the injury occurred, and where the parties' relationship was centered. In making its decision, the court noted that a federal court sitting in diversity followed the forum's choice- of-law rules, and that Delaware courts looked to the Restatement Second of Conflict of Laws for guidance in choice-of-law disputes. Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Adipogen Corporation, 82 F.Supp.3d 568, 595. D.N.J.2015. Cit. generally in sup. In a patent-infringement case brought by brand-name-drug manufacturer against North Carolina drug manufacturer that had submitted an application with the Food and Drug Administration for a generic version of plaintiff s drug, this court denied defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, holding that defendant's registered agent accepted service in New Jersey on behalf of defendant. In making its decision, the court acknowledged that New Jersey often gave considerable weight to the Restatements of the Law, and, in this case, the court relied on Restatement Second of Conflict of Laws § 44. Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Metrics, Inc., 96 F.Supp.3d 428, 439. D.Or.2015. Cit. in case quot. in sup. In a dispute over injured motorist's coverage under an automobile- insurance policy, this court determined, among other things, that, under Oregon's choice-of-law rules, the policy's choice-of-law provision, which selected Oregon law, was enforceable. The court noted that the Oregon Supreme Court had adopted the most significant relationship approach set forth in the Restatement Second of Conflict of Laws in analyzing choice-of-law problems. Powell v. System Transport, Inc., 83 F.Supp.3d 1016, 1022. Ohio App.2015. Cit. generally in cases cit. in sup. In an action brought by trustee against Florida residents to whom trustee transferred trust's Ohio real property, in which trustee sought a declaration that the deeds were invalid for not complying with Florida law, this court reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment for plaintiff, holding that the execution and validity of the deeds were governed by Ohio law. The court acknowledged that the Ohio Supreme Court followed the Restatement Second of Conflict of Laws regarding choice-of-law issues, and explained that, here, consistent with § 223 of the Restatement, it would apply the law that would be applied by the court of the situs of the real property. Miller v. Stuckey, 42 N.E.3d 304, 308. CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ALIm For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most