About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Case Citations July 2015 through February 2016 [1] (2015-2016)

handle is hein.ali/relwtrts0325 and id is 1 raw text is: TORTS Generally D.N.M.2014. Cit. generally in case cit. in sup. In a case in which cancer-treatment facility filed, inter alia, an unfair-competition claim against owner of hospitals and insurance companies, this court denied in part defendant's motion for summary judgment, holding that plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to support that claim. In making its decision, the court relied on Restatement Third of Unfair Competition § 1, but acknowledged that the New Mexico Supreme Court had previously looked to the Restatement of Torts for guidance on other matters. New Mexico Oncology and Hematology Consultants, Ltd. v. Presbyterian Healthcare Services, 54 F.Supp.3d 1189, 1236. DIVISION ONE. INTENTIONAL HARMS TO PERSONS, LAND AND CHATTELS CHAPTER 2. INTENTIONAL INVASIONS OF INTERESTS IN PERSONALITY TOPIC 5. THE INTEREST IN FREEDOM FROM EMOTIONAL DISTRESS § 46. Conduct Intended to Cause Emotional Distress Only Wash.App.2015. Cit. and quot. in disc., quot. in case quot. in disc.; Supp. (1948) cit. in disc., cit. and quot. in case cit. in sup. Former employee filed, among other things, an outrage claim against former employer that was located on land that had become a federal enclave, alleging that plaintiff suffered workplace harassment based on his sexual orientation. The trial court granted summary judgment for defendant and dismissed the complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Affirming in part, this court held that defendant was entitled to summary judgment pursuant to the doctrine of federal enclave, which barred state-law causes of action arising from events occurring on a federal enclave if the cause of action did not exist in state law at the creation of the enclave. The court explained that plaintiff's claim failed here because, prior to the creation of the enclave, an outrage claim did not exist under common- law, nor under Restatement of Torts § 46, and was only later recognized in Washington and under a 1948 Supplement to the Restatement. Peoples v. Puget Sound's Best Chicken!, Inc., 185 Wash.App. 691, 699, 700, 345 P.3d 811, 815. CHAPTER 5. ARREST AND PREVENTION OF CRIME TOPIC 1. ARREST TITLE B. CONDITIONS OF THE PRIVILEGE SUBTITLE I. IN GENERAL mAn Lw For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most