About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Case Citations [1] (July 2020 - August 2021)

handle is hein.ali/relagcy0136 and id is 1 raw text is: AGENCY
CHAPTER 14. DUTIES AND LIABILITIES OF PRINCIPAL TO AGENT
TOPIC 1. CONTRACTUAL AND QUASI-CONTRACTUAL DUTIES AND LIABILITIES
TITLE C. DEFENSES
§ 469. Disloyalty or Insubordination as Defense
Tex.App.2020. Com. (e) quot. in sup. (erron. cit. as Restatement (Second)). Attorney sued husband and
wife who had hired him to review a personal-injury settlement that they had reached with husband's
employer, seeking a declaratory judgment that he owned a 35% interest in an annuity and annuity
payments they received under the settlement; husband and wife counterclaimed for breach of fiduciary
duty. At the close of attorney's case, the trial court granted husband and wife's motion for a directed
verdict, finding that the parties' attorney-fee agreement was unconscionable, and that, while husband
and wife's counterclaim was untimely, they were entitled to disgorgement of attorney's fees. This court
reversed in part, holding that husband and wife did not have an affirmative claim supporting the remedy
of fee forfeiture, as required to recover disgorgement of fees under Restatement Third of the Law
Governing Lawyers § 37, Restatement of Restitution § 5, and the Restatement of Agency § 469. Izen v.
Laine, 614 S.W.3d 775, 791.
TOPIC 4. LIABILITY TO SERVANTS FOR TORTS OF SERVANTS, OTHER AGENTS, AND
CONTRACTORS
TITLE B. THE FELLOW SERVANT RULE
§ 475. Definition of Fellow Servant
Ky.App.2020. Cit. in case quot. in sup. Passenger who was brutally raped by the driver of her cab sued
cab service that employed the driver, alleging breach of the implied contract of safe passage. The trial
court granted cab service's motion to dismiss, finding that passenger's claim was barred by the one-year
statute of limitations for personal-injury claims. This court reversed and remanded, holding that
passenger's claim was timely under the five-year limitations period for breach-of-contract claims. The
court cited Restatement of Agency § 475 in explaining that the rule in Kentucky, and the near-universal
rule, was that a carrier was liable for assaults committed on passengers by its employees, whether the
assault was in the supposed interest and discharge of a supposed duty to the carrier or was merely that of
an individual motivated by conceptions of personal wrong and entirely disconnected with the
performance of a duty. Kendall v. Community Cab Company, Inc., 610 S.W.3d 694, 697.
COPYRIGHT ©2021 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
All rights reserved
AL I                               Printed in the United States of America
For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most