About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Case Citations [1] (July 2018 through April 2019)

handle is hein.ali/contract0187 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                                    CONTRACTS



                              CHAPTER 1. MEANING OF TERMS

  § 1. Contract Defined

  Wash.2018. Quot. in case quot. in sup. Mother of minor high-school student who was killed as a
  passenger in a single-car accident brought claims sounding in, among other things, breach of contract
  against school district, alleging that district was responsible for the actions of student's coach in
  violating the school's activity code by serving alcohol in his home to student and to the driver, who was
  also a minor student, shortly prior to the accident. The trial court granted summary judgment for district,
  and the court of appeals affirmed. Affirming, this court held that the school's activity code was not a
  contract on which mother could bring a claim for breach. The court explained that, under Restatement of
  Contracts § 1, a contract was a promise or a set of promises for the breach of which the law gave a
  remedy, or the performance of which the law in some way recognized as a duty, and that the code at
  issue was not a contract, because it did not a create a duty of protection beyond that which the law
  already imposed on district. Anderson v. Soap Lake School District, 423 P.3d 197, 215.



                   CHAPTER 3. FORMATION OF INFORMAL CONTRACTS

                            TOPIC 2. MANIFESTATION OF ASSENT

  § 74. Time When and Place Where a Contract is Made

  Ariz.App.2018. Cit. in case cit. in sup. Job applicant, who had accepted city's conditional offer of
  employment to be a parking-service agent, appealed from the denial of her claim for workers'
  compensation benefits based on an injury that she sustained during a pre-employment physical
  examination that she was required to complete in order to be hired. This court affirmed, holding that
  applicant was not entitled to benefits, because she was not a city employee at the time of her injury. The
  court noted that, under Restatement of Contracts § 74, a contract was made at the time when the last act
  necessary for its formation was done, and it was undisputed that applicant's injury occurred before the
  physical examination was finished, and that city's offer of employment was contingent on applicant's
  successful completion of the physical examination as well as certain other requirements that had not yet
  been fulfilled. Sherring v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 426 P.3d 1233, 1236.



                     TOPIC 3. CONSIDERATION AND ITS SUFFICIENCY

  § 75. Definition of Consideration

  S.D.N.Y.2018. Cit. in sup. Former licensees of the right to use a camouflage pattern that was protected
  by a utility patent sued licensor, seeking a declaration that plaintiffs' use of a second camouflage pattern
  that was owned by the federal government did not breach the parties' license. This court granted
                             COPYRIGHT 02019 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
                                           All rights reserved
AgI                                  Printed in the United States of America
            For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most