About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

Case Citations [1] (July 2017 through April 2018)

handle is hein.ali/contract0185 and id is 1 raw text is: CONTRACTS CHAPTER 3. FORMATION OF INFORMAL CONTRACTS TOPIC 4. INFORMAL CONTRACTS WITHOUT ASSENT OR CONSIDERATION § 90. Promise Reasonably Inducing Definite and Substantial Action Ark.App.2017. Quot. in sup. (general cite). Licensed practical nurse sued school district, its executive director of support services, and others, alleging that she resigned from her prior employment after a telephone conversation with director in which he let her know a position was available, asked her to come in for an interview the next day, and promised her that she would get the job. The trial court granted defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim sounding in promissory estoppel under Restatement of Contracts § 90. This court affirmed, holding that plaintiff's reliance on any alleged promise by director was not reasonable, because there was no written contract between the parties, and plaintiff was presumed to know that the school district was not liable on a purported contract unless it was in writing and approved by the school board. The court additionally pointed out that, according to plaintiff's own allegations, she resigned from her prior employment before she went in for the interview. Johnson v. Blytheville School District by its Board of Directors, 516 S.W.3d 785, 787. CHAPTER 6. CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS OF PERSONS NOT PARTIES TO THE CONTRACT § 145. Beneficiaries Under Promises to the United States, a State, or a Municipality W.D.N.Y.2017. Cit. in case quot. in disc. (general cite). Insureds under a health-insurance plan brought a putative class action for breach of contract and other claims against health-insurance provider in connection with a data breach in which hackers secured access to plaintiff's confidential health-care information from defendant, alleging that they were intended third-party beneficiaries of certain data- security provisions in a contract between defendant and the government. This court granted in part defendant's motion to dismiss, holding that plaintiffs were not intended third-party beneficiaries of the contract. The court rejected plaintiffs' argument based on a California district-court opinion that followed Restatement of Contracts § 145 in evaluating a third-party beneficiary's claim to enforce a federal contract with the defendant, noting that the California opinion did not address the plaintiffs' status as intended third-party beneficiaries. Fero v. Excellus Health Plain, Inc., 236 F.Supp.3d 735, 767. CHAPTER 9. THE SCOPE AND MEANING OF CONTRACTS TOPIC 1. INTERPRETATION § 235. Rules Aiding Application of Standards of Interpretation For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most