About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Case Citations [1] (July 2019 - August 2020)

handle is hein.ali/alicgv0094 and id is 1 raw text is: 






      PRINCIPLES OF THE LAW OF CORPORATE

                                    GOVERNANCE



                                       PART   VII. REMEDIES

                             CHAPTER 1. THE DERIVATIVE ACTION

  § 7.01 Direct and Derivative Actions Distinguished

  Conn.2019.  Subsec. (d) cit. and quot. in sup., cit in ftn., cit. and quot. in conc. and diss. op., cit. but not
  fol. in case cit. in conc. and in diss. op.; com. (d) quot. in sup.; com. (e) quot. in conc. and diss. op.
  Member  of a limited-liability company that made a bridge loan to commercial real-estate lending
  business filed, among other things, direct claims for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of the implied
  covenant of good faith and fair dealing against principal of business and against another entity owned by
  principal, based on their failure to repay the loan. After a bench trial, the trial court rendered judgment in
  favor of plaintiff on his direct claims for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of the implied covenant of
  good faith and fair dealing. Affirming in part, this court held that the trial court correctly concluded that
  plaintiff had standing to bring direct claims against defendants under the Principles of Corporate
  Governance  § 7.01, because it was undisputed that plaintiff was limited-liability company's sole
  member  and that he funded the loan with his personal funds. The dissent argued that the analysis of
  jurisdictions that had rejected § 7.01 were more persuasive, and that plaintiff should have filed his direct
  claims against defendants as derivative claims on behalf of his limited-liability company. Saunders v.
  Briner, 221 A.3d 1, 23, 24, 26, 27, 31, 33-37.

  Ind.App.2019.  Quot. in case quot. in disc. Shareholders of a publicly-traded corporation that franchised
  and operated restaurant chains filed a class action against corporation, its board, its controlling
  shareholder, and entities involved in a proposed merger with corporation, challenging defendants'
  reclassification of their shares and their treatment of certain other shares as voting stock in connection
  with the merger. The trial court granted defendants' motion to dismiss. This court affirmed, holding that
  plaintiffs' claims were barred by the Dissenters' Rights Statute. In making its decision, the court cited
  the Principles of Corporate Governance § 7.01 in explaining that plaintiffs' claims were direct claims
  that were brought in the name of a shareholder against a corporation to redress injuries sustained by
  shareholders or to enforce duties owed to shareholders, rather than derivative claims that were brought
  by a shareholder against a third party on a corporation's behalf Hipps v. Biglari Holdings, Inc., 136
  N.E.3d 629, 636.

  Wyo.2019.  Subsec. (d) cit. and quot. but not fol.; com. (e) quot. in ftn. Sub-group of limited partners in a
  limited partnership sued estate of the sole general partner of the limited partnership, seeking to remedy
  losses incurred when decedent disposed of the limited partnership's real property. The trial court granted
  defendant's motion to dismiss, finding that plaintiffs alleged harms that had to be filed as a derivative
  action on behalf of the limited partnership, because the property transactions at issue injured the limited
  partnership itself. This court affirmed. The court declined plaintiffs' request to adopt a rule guided by
  the Principles of Corporate Governance § 7.01, which granted courts discretion to allow certain

                               COPYRIGHT ©2020 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
                                             All rights reserved
                                       Printed in the United States of America

<« q et r   For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most