About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

19 Prof. Law. 1 (2008-2009)
Issue 2

handle is hein.journals/proflw19 and id is 29 raw text is: Regulation of the Legal Profession in the United States
and the Future of Global Law Practice

Anthony E. Davis
This paper will address three questions:
1. What are the underlying goals and distinc-
tive features of the new regulatory schemes
in England and Australia and how are they
similar or dissimilar to the regulatory goals
in the United States?
2. How might U.S.-based global law firms
respond if lawyer regulation in the United
States does not change in ways that can ac-
commodate the new English and Australian
regimes?
3. What are the implications of these devel-
opments for the U.S. regulatory environ-
ment and are there ways in which U.S.
lawyer regulation could adapt to these new
developments?
What are the underlying goals and distinctive
features of the new regulatory schemes in England
and Australia and how are they similar or dissimi-
lar to the regulatory goals in the United States?
Regulatory Objectives is a defined term in the
first section of the English Legal Services Act 2007.
The objectives listed are:
(a) protecting and promoting the public interest;
(b) supporting the constitutional principle of the
rule of law;
(c) improving access to justice;
(d) protecting and promoting the interests of
consumers;
(e) promoting competition in the provision of
services with subsection (2);
(f) encouraging an independent, strong, diverse
and effective legal profession;
Anthony E. Davis is a partner with Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP in New York, N.Y.

(g) increasing public understanding of the
citizen's legal rights and duties;
(h) promoting and maintaining adherence to the
professional principles.
Seven of these nine principles are entirely
consistent with those to which every regulator of
lawyers in the U.S. would aspire for their individual
jurisdictions (even if the language used is slightly
unfamiliar).
The two goals that need to be specially identified
and understood because the English and Australian
regulators relied heavily on these concepts are: (d)
protecting and promoting the interests of consum-
ers; and (e) promoting competition in the provision
of services ... It is important to realize that even
though the approach of the new English and Austra-
lian regulatory systems in connection with these
two principles is very different from the approach
used in the U.S.-and may even seem shocking-
in the whole, these regulators have similar underly-
ing goals, including, inter alia, protecting clients
and the public and improving access to justice.
What is the significance of (d) protecting and
promoting the interests of consumers? The English
legislators who established these principles were
interested in providing consumers with two distinct
benefits: increasing their options, especially if do-
ing so might reduce their costs, and seeing to it that
the disciplinary structure was focused on redressing
consumer complaints against lawyers. This prin-
ciple is designed in part to insure that regulators
oversee the profession's level of service, primar-
ily to give clients redress when their lawyers fall
short-and only secondarily to discipline lawyers
for violating rules.

(Continued on page 8)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most