About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

39 Mercer L. Rev. 477 (1987-1988)
The Precedential Value of Unpublished Judicial Opinions

handle is hein.journals/mercer39 and id is 487 raw text is: The Precedential Value of Unpublished Judicial Opinionst by George M. Weaver* I. INTRODUCTION The purposes of this Article are to examine the role of unpublished judicial decisions in the law and to determine what part of the law is formed by such opinions. This Article will not address the desirability of limited publication.' It will be shown that unpublished opinions have the same dispute-settling capacity as published opinions. Unpublished opin- ions should not, however, be regarded as precedent. Nevertheless, they should be citable for other purposes. The work load of American courts has increased dramatically in recent years. The statistics are familiar. During the year ending June 30, 1980, plaintiffs filed 188,487 cases in the United States district courts. By the year ending June 30, 1985, the number of cases filed had grown to 299,164. In the United States courts of appeals, the number of appeals during the same period increased from 23,200 to 33,360.2 The increase in t Copyright 0 1986 by George M: Weaver. * Partner in the firm of England & Weaver, Atlanta, Georgia. (B.A., 1972); (J.D., 1975). Member, State Bar of Georgia. 1. Considerable debate has occurred over the desirability of unpublished opinions. See generally W. Reynolds, Judicial Process in a Nutshell § 3.9 (1980); Reynolds & Richman, The Non-Precedential Precedent -Limited Publication and No-Citation Rules in the United States Courts of Appeals, 78 COLUM. L. Rav. 1167 (1978); Render, On Unpublished Opinions, 73 Ky. L.J, 145, 152-55 (1984-85). One primary concern is that nonpublication might become a means of concealing questionable dispositions. Indeed, inconsistencies have been noted between unpublished and published decisions. E.g., Krolick Contracting Corp. v. Benefits Rev. Bd., 558 F.2d 685, 689 (3d Cir. 1977) (acknowledging inconsistency); Jones v. Superintendent, Va. State Farm, 465 F.2d 1091, 1093 (4th Cir. 1972) (acknowledging incon- sistency). See also Render, supra, at 155-61; Reynolds & Richman, supra, at 1192-93. 2. Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Federal Court Man- agement Statistics (1985). See also Chanin, A Survey of the Writing and Publication of Opinions in Federal and State Appellate Courts, 67 L Lim J. 362 (1974); National Center for State Courts, State Appellate Caseload Growth 2 (Oct. 1983) (cited in Overton, A Pre-

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most