About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

79 U. Colo. L. Rev. 587 (2008)
Reverse 404(B) Evidence: Exploring Standards when Defendants Want to Introduce Other Bad Acts of Third Parties

handle is hein.journals/ucollr79 and id is 593 raw text is: REVERSE 404(B) EVIDENCE: EXPLORING STANDARDS WHEN DEFENDANTS WANT TO INTRODUCE OTHER BAD ACTS OF THIRD PARTIES JESSICA BRODERICK* Reverse 404(b) evidence is the name courts have given to a less common use of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), wherein a defendant attempts to introduce the other bad acts of a third party, usually to prove that this third party committed the crime of which the defendant is accused or that the third party coerced the defendant into committing the crime. This Comment first reviews the standard use of FRE 404(b): when prosecutors seek to introduce other bad acts of the defendant. Then it explores how federal courts have addressed reverse 404(b) evidence. Currently there is no consensus among the circuits on what standard to use for admitting the evidence. Some consider the same strict requirements as are used to admit standard 404(b) evidence, while others seem to disre- gard the requirements of the rule altogether in order to give the defendant the best opportunity to present a complete de- fense. Additionally, the Comment shows how two state courts, those of Colorado and Kansas, have dealt with re- verse 404(b) evidence in opposite ways. Finally, the Com- ment proposes two solutions for addressing reverse 404(b) evidence. These solutions balance the interests of all parties and, if adopted by the circuits and followed in the states, would promote consistency. INTRODUCTION A bedrock tenet of our criminal justice system is a defen- dant's right to defend the charges brought against him. As the * Candidate for Juris Doctor, University of Colorado School of Law, 2008; B.A., University of Northern Colorado, 2004. Special thanks to Professor Christo- pher Mueller for his comments and suggestions, the University of Colorado Law Review staff for their editorial contributions, and Matt Broderick for his ongoing support and encouragement.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most