About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

45 Stetson L. Rev. 153 (2015-2016)
Newly Informed Decency of Death: Hall v. Florida Endorses the Marshall Hypothesis in Eighth Amendment Review of the Death Penalty, The

handle is hein.journals/stet45 and id is 167 raw text is: 









THE NEWLY INFORMED DECENCY OF DEATH:
HALL V FLORIDA ENDORSES THE MARSHALL
HYPOTHESIS IN EIGHTH AMENDMENT
REVIEW OF THE DEATH PENALTY


   Chance  Meyer*


                        .      INTRODUCTION

     The farm animals overthrow Farmer  Jones to secure their equality.
Afterwards, the pigs, which led the revolt, form a new regime to rule the
farm. They proclaim all animals to be equal. And, for a time, things are
better. But the ideal of equality proves difficult to maintain in practice.
The pigs become corrupt. They transmogrify into humanlike rulers of the
very sort they had replaced. They begin walking upright, wearing clothes,
dining with farmers, and reigning over the farm like dictators. Ultimately,
as corrupt humans  sometimes  will, they rethink their proclamation of
equality. While they still hold all animals to be equal, they now declare,
some  animals are more equal than others.
     Nearly thirty years after the 1945 publication of George Orwell's
Animal Farm ,2 the American death penalty underwent a regime change of
its own. In Furman v. Georgia,' the United States Supreme Court found
that the manner  in which states were imposing the death penalty was
cruel and unusual, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Each justice
in the majority had different reasons, and each wrote separately. Among
the five of them, they described the practice of the day  as wanton,



* V 2016, Chance Meyer. All Rights Reserved. Assistant Counsel, Capital Collateral Regional
Counsel, Southern Region of Florida; Adjunct Professor, Shepard Broad Law Center, Nova
Southeastern University; J.D., Tulane University Law School, 2007.
    1. GEORGE ORWELL, ANIMAL FARM 134 (1945).
    2. Id.
    3. 408 U.S. 238 (1972).
    4. See id. at 239-40 (finding it unconstitutional to impose the death penalty under certain state
statutes representative of the practice across the nation).
   5. In fact, the Court had not been so visibly fragmented since its earliest days, agreeing only
on a terse per curiam statement announcing the result reached, and issuing nine separate opinions,
four in dissent. Robert A. Burt, Disorder in the Court: The Death Penalty and the Constitution, 85 MICH.
L. REV. 1741, 1758 (1987).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most