About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1967 - July DOT Ord. & Dec. [1] (July, 1967)

handle is hein.usfed/dotod0149 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Order No. E-25445


                    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                    CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD
                        WASHINGTON, D. C.

             Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board      )7) N\ )W
                at its office in Washington, D.C.
                on the 24th day of July, 1967


WASHINGTON/BALTIMORE HELICOPTER                   Docket 17665
     SERVICE INVESTIGATION


         ORDER CONSOLIDATING AND DISMISSING APPLICATIONS
                 AND DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS

     On June 19, 1967, a group of 11 air carriers serving Washington
and Baltimore filed an application on behalf of Washington Airways,
Inc., Docket 18705, and a motion to consolidate. The application is
the product of a canvass of trunk line and local service carriers
serving Baltimore and Washington, which was authorized by Order E-25020
of April 20, 1967, pursuant to a request of American Airlines, Inc.
Answers opposing consolidation and motions to dismiss the application
have been filed by Washington-Baltimore Helicopter Airways, Inc.,
(WBHA) and National Capital Airlines, Inc. An answer of New York
Airways, Inc., does not object to consolidation but requests that
the application be confined to the issues as set forth in Board orders
defining the scope of the proceeding. Washington Airways has filed
a consolidated answer to the motions of National Capital and WBHA.
On July 5, 1967, Washington Airways requested leave to amend the ap-
plication accompanied by the proposed amendment. The amendment pro-
vides details as to the actual incorporation of Washington Airways in
the state of Delaware. An answer in opposition to the request and a
motion to dismiss the amendment was filed by WBHA on July 11, 1967.

     The answers and motions of National Capital and WBHA advance a
number of technical objections, pointing out instances wherein the
application does not conform precisely to the Rules of Practice re-
lating to the form and contents of such documents. These include a
failure to recite the corporate status of the applicant, the state
of incorporation, citizenship requirements, a designation of the ter-
minal and intermediate points to be served, a map showing the loca-
tion of such points, and a precise designation of aircraft types that
will be used. They contend further that the application is deficient
since there is no tender of copies of the agreements between the ap-
plicant carriers which form the basis of the arrangement, nor has

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most