HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.unl/junadtt0021 and id is 1 raw text is: United Nations
AT/DEC/1101
Administrative Tribunal
Distr.: Limited
30 September 2003
Original: English
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Judgement No. 1101
Case No. 1041: SOKOLOV
Against: The United Nations Joint Staff
Pension Board
THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS,
Composed of Mr. Mayer Gabay, First Vice-President, presiding; Mr. Kevin
Haugh, Second Vice-President; Ms. Jacqueline Scott;
Whereas, on 28 March 2001, Dmitri Konstantinovich Sokolov, a former
participant of the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund (hereinafter referred to as
UNJSPF or the Fund), filed an application that did not fulfil all the formal
requirements of article 7 of the Rules of the Tribunal;
Whereas, on 31 May 2001, the Applicant, after making the necessary
corrections, again filed an Application in which he requested, in accordance with
article 12 of the Statute of the Tribunal, the revision of Judgement No. 957 rendered
by the Tribunal on 3 1 July 2000;
Whereas the Application contained pleas requesting the Tribunal to:
[Oblige the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund (UNJSPF) to reinstate
him in the Pension Fund or to pay to him personally and directly, completely
or in part, the accumulation of his pension as per the payment instruction of 3
November 1980].
Whereas, on 21 January 2003, having not received a Respondent's answer, the
Tribunal decided that it would consider the case at its next session, on the basis of
the documentation contained in the dossier; and, on 23 January 2003, the
Respondent concurred with the decision of the Tribunal;](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.unl/junadtt0021&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)