About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

261 IRET Congressional Advisory 1 (2010)

handle is hein.taxfoundation/iretcgadv0258 and id is 1 raw text is: INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON THE ECONOMICS OF TAXATION
IRET is a non-profit 501 (c)(3) economic policy research and educational organization devoted to informing
the public about policies that will promote growth and efficient operation of the market economy.
January 19, 2010                                                                Advisory No. 261
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF SURTAXES
IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE HEALTH BILLS
Executive Summary
The paper examines two proposed surtaxes on upper-income individuals in the House and
Senate versions of the health care bill. The official budget scores of the bills claim the burden
of the surtaxes would fall only on the rich. These claims are based on unrealistic static
economic assumptions. In reality, the bills would depress GDP, and everyone would feel the
effect of the taxes, not just the rich. Much less revenue would be raised than forecast. The
bills would increase the federal deficit. State and local budgets would be hit too. If paired
with expiration of the portions of the Bush tax cuts that had applied to upper-income taxpayers,
the adverse economic effects would be even worse.
Based on static economic assumptions, the House health bill's 5.4% of AGI surtax on high
incomes is officially forecast:
*  To raise $460.5 billion over ten years;
* To affect only about 0.3% of taxpayers, those with incomes above $500,000 ($1 million for
joint filers).
In reality, we calculate that on a dynamic basis, after economic reactions to the tax, the House
5.4% AGI surtax would:
*  Depress annual GDP by about 1.7% (not factored into the official analysis) and lower the
capital stock about 3.4%;
*  Reduce after-tax income for the remaining 99.7% of the population by about 1.5% across
the board (so that everyone would be hurt, not just the rich);
*  Lose about 73% of its anticipated annual addition to federal income tax revenue due to
lower GDP;
*  Reduce other federal revenues, resulting in a net drop in annual total federal revenues,
bringing the combined dynamic loss to 115% of the anticipated static gain.
*  Reduce state and local tax revenues due to lower GDP.

g~*m    A3A              g.m         S I   66.   6 A~

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most