About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

233 IRET Congressional Advisory 1 (2007)

handle is hein.taxfoundation/iretcgadv0230 and id is 1 raw text is: INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON THE ECONOMICS OF TAXATION
IRET is a non-profit 501 (c)(3) economic policy research and educational organization devoted to informing
the public about policies thait will promote growth and efficient operation of the market economy.

December 5, 2007

Advisory No. 233

TAXPAYERS THREATENED BY PROPOSAL TO SUBJECT
TAX EXPENDITURES TO PERFORMANCE BUDGETING

The House Budget Committee recently convened
a hearing on performance budgeting. Performance
budgeting refers to efforts to compare the amounts
spent on government programs with the programs'
goals and measured results.   At the hearing,
Chairman John Spratt (D-SC) provided a good
summary of why performance budgeting, if properly
implemented, is desirable, Given the daunting
challenges that face us budgetarily, we need more
than ever to put the taxpayer dollars to the wisest
possible use.'1
Performance budgeting, with its emphasis on
identifying  government programs' goals   and
assessing their results, is not a new concept.
However, many earlier efforts to implement it, such
as the Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System
(PPBS) in the 1960s, Management by Objectives in
the early 1970s, Zero-Based Budgeting (ZZB) in the
later 1970s, and Reinventing Government in the
1990s, had little impact, notwithstanding the claims
of some supporters that they would transform
government.
Currently, the Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) requires government
agencies to develop performance plans and report
their results yearly, with the hope that the
information will be useful to managers within the
agencies and will assist the legislative and executive
branches  in  assessing  government   spending
programs.2 In addition, the Bush Administration has
developed its own Program Assessment Rating Tool
(PART), which attempts to systematically and
consistently grade each government program based

on its purpose, planning, management, and results.'
A study by the U.S. General Accounting Office
(GAO) in 2004 found that the Administration's
assessment tool is beneficial, although the GAO saw
room for improvement.4
Realistically, performance budgeting has the
potential to slightly sharpen the focus of government
programs and make them somewhat more results
oriented, but it is unlikely to transform government.
Two general obstacles are that the incentives within
government are often unrelated   to  programs'
effectiveness and that legislators and Presidents often
pay scant attention to effectiveness when pushing for
programs they want.   In addition, performance
budgeting is not good at evaluating the basic
questions of whether a particular program is a
legitimate function of government, whether the
government can carry out the activity better than the
private sector, and whether the payments made by the
program and the taxes financing the program create
perverse incentives that hurt the economy. Further,
measuring results is often difficult. These problems
are noted not to deny that performance budgeting has
value - it is a highly desirable effort to combat
waste, fraud, and abuse in government - but to
caution against its potential benefits being oversold.
A proposal to conduct reviews of taxes not levied
as though they were spending programs.
Chairman Spratt said at the start of the Budget
Committee hearing, Our question today is whether
or not there are ways that we can improve the tools
we use to measure government performance and

e~sm      Al                             A      *  *    gg~    a      ~gg

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most